[SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Measuring Surface Flatness (was "Cabinet Grade Particle Board")

[Wayne Galligan]

Oh yah on the rudder thing.   I was just going to put some ply on the bottom edge but I like your idea of strengthening up the rudder with the 3/4 stuff.   I am going to do the same thing with the ailerons per another fellows recommendation.  I will also strengthen the servo area with a false rib.   I am going to install hard dowel and use 6/32 bolt like on my pattern setups.  
Caint wait....  I was considering making a new nose ringless mount. But am going with a std D.Brown mount for now.  I would have to cut the engine box back a little and that wouldn't be no biggy thing to do.

Wayno

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:50 PM
  Subject: [SPAM] Re: Measuring Surface Flatness (was "Cabinet Grade Particle Board")


  Hey BTW, are you the EVL1?? I don't recognize the address. Inquiring minds want to know

  To answer the question, yes and no. Enclose the gimbals with a metal screen--yes. As is, operating in the 72 MHz band--no, probably not.

  MattK

  In a message dated 11/23/2004 6:41:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, pattern4u at comcast.net writes:
    The big question is;

    "Is my Ali TX case a working Faraday cube????"

    E.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com 
      To: discussion at nsrca.org 
      Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:55 PM
      Subject: Re: Measuring Surface Flatness (was "Cabinet Grade Particle Board")


      The tangents that some threads create are often much more interesting than the original intent of the thread. 

      Keith I would say it's not a good idea. If you built a fuse out of this material, (done everyday BTW),  I suggest you build it large enough to accomodate the person flying it (vbg). I know Bill, Don Ramsey and Al Glenn and probably several more, flew or still fly "Faraday Cages" for a living

      Now, how we went from measuring surface flatness to "shielding" devices from EMI/RFI (regardless of what the emitting source is), is beyond me

      MattK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041124/06aff0cc/attachment.html