[SPAM] Re: Measuring Surface Flatness (was "Cabinet Grade Particle Board")

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Hey BTW, are you the EVL1?? I don't recognize the address. Inquiring minds  
want to know
 
To answer the question, yes and no. Enclose the gimbals with a metal  
screen--yes. As is, operating in the 72 MHz band--no, probably not.
 
MattK
 
In a message dated 11/23/2004 6:41:42 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
pattern4u at comcast.net writes:

The big question is;
 
"Is my Ali TX case a working Faraday cube????"

E.

----- Original Message ----- 
From:  _Rcmaster199 at aol.com_ (mailto:Rcmaster199 at aol.com)  
To: _discussion at nsrca.org_ (mailto:discussion at nsrca.org)  
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:55  PM
Subject: Re: Measuring Surface Flatness  (was "Cabinet Grade Particle Board")



The tangents that some threads create are often much more interesting  than 
the original intent of the thread. 
 
Keith I would say it's not a good idea. If you built a fuse out of this  
material, (done everyday BTW),  I suggest you build it large enough to  accomodate 
the person flying it (vbg). I know Bill, Don Ramsey and Al Glenn  and 
probably several more, flew or still fly "Faraday Cages" for a  living
 
Now, how we went from measuring surface flatness to "shielding" devices  from 
EMI/RFI (regardless of what the emitting source is), is beyond me
 
MattK





 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041123/2984ab41/attachment-0001.html