Measuring Surface Flatness (was "Cabinet Grade Particle Board")
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Tue Nov 23 12:55:48 AKST 2004
The tangents that some threads create are often much more interesting than
the original intent of the thread.
Keith I would say it's not a good idea. If you built a fuse out of this
material, (done everyday BTW), I suggest you build it large enough to accomodate
the person flying it (vbg). I know Bill, Don Ramsey and Al Glenn and
probably several more, flew or still fly "Faraday Cages" for a living
Now, how we went from measuring surface flatness to "shielding" devices from
EMI/RFI (regardless of what the emitting source is), is beyond me
MattK
In a message dated 11/23/2004 4:32:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,
tkeithb at comcast.net writes:
In other words, if you built your fuse out of this material you'd probably
want to run your antenna externally. ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: _Bob Richards_ (mailto:bob at toprudder.com)
To: _discussion at nsrca.org_ (mailto:discussion at nsrca.org)
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: Measuring Surface Flatness (was "Cabinet Grade Particle Board")
John,
I disagree. The definition of a "Faraday CAGE", which is what Bill said, is
a completely conductive sealed enclosure.
Also, the edges don't have to be fully bonded together for RF protection.
They can be stitched together at intervals depending on how high in frequency
you want attenuation. The closer the spacing, the higher the cutoff frequency.
Obviously, if you want cutoff up into the gigahertz range, you pretty much
need a continuous bond.
_http://www.boltlightningprotection.com/Elemental_Faraday_Cage.htm_
(http://www.boltlightningprotection.com/Elemental_Faraday_Cage.htm)
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage_
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage)
Bob.
John Ferrell <johnferrell at earthlink.net> wrote:
Sorry to get picky, but a Faraday shield is not an electromagnetic field, it
is an electrostatic shield.
An rf tight room needs the edges fully bonded together and a Faraday shield
requires that they be insulated.
I think everyone knows what is being said, but I felt obliged to add the
detail.
John Ferrell
My Competition is not my enemy!
_http://DixieNC.US_ (http://dixienc.us/)
----- Original Message -----
From: _Bob Richards_ (mailto:bob at toprudder.com)
To: _discussion at nsrca.org_ (mailto:discussion at nsrca.org)
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: Measuring Surface Flatness (was "Cabinet Grade Particle Board")
That's what it is. No RF gets in or out. Something like 110dB attenuation.
Bob.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041123/310e16a5/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list