Diamond stab cross section - Dean Pappas
Bill Glaze
billglaze at triad.rr.com
Mon Nov 22 13:05:53 AKST 2004
When Jason went to the World's, the word from knowledgeable sources,
(people involved in the Trials at Triple Tree ) said $750. That's where
I got the figure. No, not right then; I'm fully aware that Jason flew
glow at the tryouts. It was later, after he had flown in Poland. And,
it wasn't stressed; just mentioned. As I say, it's my best information,
at the time. If it's changed, so be it. It would be for the better.
Bill Glaze
Doug Cronkhite wrote:
> This is the problem with rumor as opposed to fact. Where did you get
> the idea the batteries were $750 each? You're looking at about $350
> per full battery setup (2 x 5s3p) so 2 packs would be around $700.
>
> I don't think you'll ever NEED to fly electric, at least not in the
> forseeable future. Some of us just want to do so now.
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bill Glaze
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 1:24 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Diamond stab cross section - Dean Pappas
>
> Del:
> I can only ride one horse at a time. I've come to the conclusion
> that, if I were to go electric, I would have to dispense with all
> my glow stuff. And, considering that the battery packs are
> rumored to be as much as $750 per, and the motors seem to be as
> expensive as the glow engines I'm running, it would seem that the
> break-even point for cost, (if there is one<G>) would be so far
> down the road as to be impractible. If and when electrics get
> extremely popular, the glow equipment will lose what resale value
> it has, making the financial gulf even wider. Plus, it is also
> rumored that the operational life of the packs are nowhere near
> the cyclic ability of the lesser stressed forms of battery technology.
> If someone has started in electrics from the git-go, and they
> decide they want to go pattern, the jump in technology/price may
> be considerably smaller. Depending, of course, on battery cost,
> which will be determined, among many other factors, on how many
> packs this individual feels they need, and the motor cost. It
> very well could be the way to go for that individual. And, it
> follows, that the dedicated battery flyer, who has become
> interested in pattern, would naturally look for an electric
> outlet. (Har!)
> I do believe that there are electrics in pattern in the future,
> just not probably in my future. And, I am reminded that battery
> techhnology is an industrial segment that, right now, is in a
> state of heavy flux and research, and movement forward.
> That's as far as my crystal ball reaches, right now! And, it's
> worth what most opinions are worth.
>
> Bill Glaze
>
> Del Rykert wrote:
>
>> Electrics won't ruin pattern but it will drive some away from the
>> sport... Those that can't afford to switch will be left playing
>> with a dis-advantage similar to the 60 versus 120 size fiasco.
>> Many claimed it wasn't going to make that big of difference but
>> it will or else so many wouldn't be going through all the trouble
>> of developing electrics. No the sky isn't falling but it sure
>> isn't going to bring a bunch of new fliers to pattern either.
>>
>> del
>> NSRCA - 473
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Bob Richards <mailto:bob at toprudder.com>
>> To: discussion at nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 11:11 PM
>> Subject: RE: Diamond stab cross section - Dean Pappas
>>
>> Electrics are going to ruin pattern!!! :-)
>>
>> Kick butt, Jason!!
>>
>>
>> Jason <jasonshulman at cox.net <mailto:jasonshulman at cox.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Don't forget how bad an electric pattern plane will
>> be...especially at the Worlds....
>>
>> Sorry, had to say it.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>> <mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041122/d1a9797e/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list