[SPAM] RE: Unusal Props
Bill Glaze
billglaze at triad.rr.com
Wed Nov 17 17:42:35 AKST 2004
At the same time that Toshiba sold our submarine propeller design to the
Russians, and the machinery to make them to the Norwegians. It all
happened ~1987+/-
As is known, a submarine's most potent weapon is the fact that it is
nearly undetectable; the propeller design is a major function of that
low noise emission, per the new Seawolf class of boats.
Dean Pappas wrote:
> That's right, and it was a closely held technology until only a few
> years before APCs became available.
>
> The benefits of the scimitar shape for delaying compressibility
> effects at high prop tip Mach numbers have been known since WW2. As it
> turns out, Von proved the value of knowing how to read!
>
>
> Dean Pappas
> Sr. Design Engineer
> Kodeos Communications
> 111 Corporate Blvd.
> South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
> (908) 222-7817 phone
> (908) 222-2392 fax
> d.pappas at kodeos.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of DaveL322 at comcast.net
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 1:44 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: [SPAM] RE: Unusal Props
>
> I believe the CAD/CAM, software, algorithms, etc used to develop
> the technology/process for the APC prop line came from "quiet"
> propellers on submarines.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave Lockhart
> DaveL322 at comcast.net <mailto:DaveL322 at comcast.net>
>
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
> Dave Von Linsowe was experimenting with semi-scimitar shaped
> props at that time, I wonder if APC was influenced by his efforts.
>
>
>
> Rich
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
> Rcmaster199 at aol.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 1:32 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Unusal Props
>
> Yes we do. The semi-scimitar design was a huge departure
> from the "Normal". I heard from many "...what an ugly
> prop.....never will use.... blah, blah, blah...." among
> other things. But performance has silenced everyone.
>
> Matt
>
>
> In a message dated 11/17/2004 1:24:21 PM Eastern Standard
> Time, rcaerobob at cox.net writes:
>
> Mostly the Rev Ups were used because they made our
> motors SING!!! I mean FAST...LOUD...but never went
> anywhere.
> We didn't know better.
>
> Then came MK and Asano....
> Then this maverick APC thing....Boys, we remember when
> THOSE first hit the pits, don't we??????????
>
> Bob Pastorello
> NSRCA 199 AMA 46373
> rcaerobob at cox.net <mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net>
> www.rcaerobats.net <http://www.rcaerobats.net/>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Eddie Batchelor
> <mailto:perkinsrx at centurytel.net>
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:18 PM
> Subject: RE: Unusal Props
>
> True It might be that.
> I don't think I've ever seen a prop labeled as to
> how many blades.
> Interesting thought
> I like you're "tlarld"
>
> the prop markings are like this
> 2
> 12 O 5
> REV-UP
>
> with the "O" being the hole in the middle.
>
> It's times like this I wish the "list" could
> handle pictures. <G>
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041118/106a9235/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list