Partner and Lazulite elevators

[Ron Barr]

Partner and Lazulite elevatorsI agree with Earl on this one -- he has done the research with both elevators..  I have two Smaragds and a Partner.  My elevators are about 1/3 of the total horizontal stab and it gives a softer feel around neutral.  Earl and I have discussed this extensively and feel the larger elevator is the way to go.  Also if you go with pull-pull elevator the horns would be too far out with the stock elevator.

Ron Barr 
NSRCA 249 ---FAI
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Earl Haury 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 9:11 AM
  Subject: Re: Partner and Lazulite elevators


  Tom

  I've flown the Partner with both the stock elevators and elevators similar in size to the Smaragd. I initially found the Partner too pitch sensitive around neutral for my taste, even after moving the CG to the front of the wing tube socket. (The correct location according to Quique, and trimming exercises.) A friend flies a Smaragd and felt that the elevator was much softer around neutral, so I built another set of stabs with the larger elevators (hinge line moved forward). This is one of those counterintuitive things. I prefer the feel of the larger elevators around neutral and find no degradation of snaps. There is a slight improvement in spin entry. 

  Another reason some have used larger elevators is that moving the hinge line forward allows the control horns to be closer to the fuselage, which is desirable when using pull-pull cables for linkage (I don't).

  Earl
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Koenig, Tom 
    To: Discussion 
    Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 9:44 PM
    Subject: Partner and Lazulite elevators


    Hi again all, 

    Owners of the Pl Partner and Lazulites, I would like your thoughts. 

    Before I finish the stabs and elevators, I am somewhat concerned at the very small elevators found on these models. I've seen one Partner fly and the owner suggested to DEFINATELY enlarge the elevators. I tend to agree...but who am I to argue with Quique and the Matt's design philosophy.

    If the consensus is to make them bigger, then I will, as sofar I'm not comfortable with their current size. 

    Thanks for any ideas. 

    best regards 

    Tom 

    PS: If any of you have been cruising on any Aussie sites recently....the guy who just had his behind kicked at our State champs and W/C team trials...was NOT me ( he just happens to look like me, have the same name and job, seems to be married to the same woman....OK..... OK it was me, I admit it !)

    Shall we just say I had a shocker of a weekend ? 

************************************************************************
*PLEASE NOTE*  This email and any attachments may
be confidential. If received in error, please delete all

copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or

dissemination of this email or its attachments is

prohibited without the consent of the sender.

WARNING RE VIRUSES:  Our computer systems sweep
outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty

is given that this email or its attachments are virus free.

Before opening or using attachments, please check for

viruses.  Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any

affected attachments.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the

individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
and with authority, states them to be the views of the

organisation.
************************************************************************
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041114/9faa0135/attachment.html