*SPAM* [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote

[Bill Glaze]

Mark:
Just underscores what I've said.  Pattern is run by AMA, period.  NSRCA 
has no visible influence, apparently, or our survey wouldn't have been 
ignored.
Bet the response on another survey would be great!  Why waste the time?  
Oh, Well.

Atwood, Mark wrote:

> Just to clarify...it's AMA district VP...not NSRCA district VP.  Which 
> I have to admit is awkward...since most of my pattern interaction is 
> with NSCRA district 4...many of whom are NOT in AMA district 3.
>  
> -Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org 
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Dean Pappas
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 9:53 AM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: *SPAM* [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>
> Hi Bill,
> The district VP appoints the CB members. Fortunately in my district 
> the CB member is with the program, so I don't have to yell. He's even 
> a fun guy ...
> Dean
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Bill Glaze [mailto:billglaze at triad.rr.com]
>     Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 5:44 PM
>     To: discussion at nsrca.org
>     Subject: Re: [SPAM] RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>
>     Dean:
>     Out of curiosity..........will hounding our districe VE's do any
>     good?  they have no vote,as far as I know.  All they can do, as I
>     understand it, is to offer their opinions to the CB, same as you
>     and me.  Am Imisisng something here?  Wouldn't be the first time!<G>
>
>     Bill Glaze
>
>
>     Dean Pappas wrote:
>
>>     So let's publish the voting record in the K-Factor. It's only
>>     useful if we all go hound our AMA dstrict VPs as a result.
>>     Dean
>>
>>         -----Original Message-----
>>         From: Del Rykert [mailto:drykert at localnet.com]
>>         Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 2:26 PM
>>         To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>         Subject: Re: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>>
>>         Ed....
>>             Sounds great ... BUT...  
>>         We have been down this time a few times before over the
>>         years. Just different magnitudes and with internet is more
>>         open forum for discussion. Some members have a different
>>         agenda and follow what they feel is important.
>>              My suggestion is to make those that vote and control the
>>         issues that guide this SPORT have their voting record posted
>>         on this forum or on the NSRCA web site for us to review and
>>         question the motives behind their decisions. Sort of like the
>>         ribbing that goes on for sandbaggers to move up. It would
>>         either drive the people underground or out of office.  Both
>>         might be better than keep repeating history.  This is only
>>         MHO as lame as it may be. 
>>          
>>                                del
>>                        NSRCA - 473
>>         ----- Original Message -----
>>
>>             From: Ed Deaver <mailto:divesplat at yahoo.com>
>>             To: discussion at nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>
>>             Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:11 PM
>>             Subject: RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>>
>>             Having read all the posting on the list on this subject. 
>>             Several things are clear to me and this is simply my take
>>             on things.
>>              
>>             1)  The vote is over.  What's done is done and that's it.
>>              
>>             2)  Some people are mad some are not(human nature is such
>>             that usually only the upset ones voice an opinion ie
>>             lobbyiest success in our capital)
>>              
>>             3)  Their is nothing at this time to be achieved by
>>             continuing to persue th negatives.
>>              
>>             4)  We can however learn from this experience.  More
>>             emphasis has to be placed on calling our AMA District
>>             Reps.  A formal survey is only a document and can be
>>             scewed in any which way, same as a phone poll.  We are
>>             again at, the membership must contact the District Reps
>>             to give input.
>>              
>>             5)  As with most activities or memberships, a very few
>>             are passionate and highly motivated.
>>              
>>             6)  Lets do our best to accept these changes, read not
>>             agree with or like, but accept and work towards the next
>>             rules cycle where someone may add a snap into the new
>>             Intermediate schedule and if so wished, add a new rules
>>             proposal to add scoring of L/TO.
>>              
>>             Just my opinion.
>>             ed
>>
>>             Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>                 What follows is an exchange of e-mails between Lance
>>                 Van Nostrand, the
>>                 List, John Fuqua and me. If it comes through as
>>                 presented, John's
>>                 comments are in blue.
>>
>>                 Ron Van Putte
>>
>>                 From: johnfuqua at gdsys.net
>>                 Subject: RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>>                 Date: May 11, 2004 8:50:34 PM CDT
>>                 To: vanputte at cox.net
>>
>>                 From: Ron Van Putte
>>                     **  Klipped 4 reposting..  **
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040513/3814e861/attachment.html