Rules Proposals Final Vote

[Bill Glaze]

Del:
Great for openers.  Another idea would be to let us, as affected 
members, have a say on who sits on these boards; not simply appointed by 
somebody who may not be remotely interested in our sport.  I don't 
recall even being given the opportunity to vote..............or have I 
missed an opportunity, and simply forgot to vote? O:-)
Bill Glaze

Del Rykert wrote:

> Ed....
>     Sounds great ... BUT...  
> We have been down this time a few times before over the years. Just 
> different magnitudes and with internet is more open forum for 
> discussion. Some members have a different agenda and follow what they 
> feel is important.
>      My suggestion is to make those that vote and control the issues 
> that guide this SPORT have their voting record posted on this forum or 
> on the NSRCA web site for us to review and question the motives behind 
> their decisions. Sort of like the ribbing that goes on for sandbaggers 
> to move up. It would either drive the people underground or out of 
> office.  Both might be better than keep repeating history.  This 
> is only MHO as lame as it may be. 
>  
>                        del
>                NSRCA - 473
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>     From: Ed Deaver <mailto:divesplat at yahoo.com>
>     To: discussion at nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>
>     Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:11 PM
>     Subject: RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>
>     Having read all the posting on the list on this subject.  Several
>     things are clear to me and this is simply my take on things.
>      
>     1)  The vote is over.  What's done is done and that's it.
>      
>     2)  Some people are mad some are not(human nature is such that
>     usually only the upset ones voice an opinion ie lobbyiest success
>     in our capital)
>      
>     3)  Their is nothing at this time to be achieved by continuing to
>     persue th negatives.
>      
>     4)  We can however learn from this experience.  More emphasis has
>     to be placed on calling our AMA District Reps.  A formal survey is
>     only a document and can be scewed in any which way, same as a
>     phone poll.  We are again at, the membership must contact the
>     District Reps to give input.
>      
>     5)  As with most activities or memberships, a very few are
>     passionate and highly motivated.
>      
>     6)  Lets do our best to accept these changes, read not agree with
>     or like, but accept and work towards the next rules cycle where
>     someone may add a snap into the new Intermediate schedule and if
>     so wished, add a new rules proposal to add scoring of L/TO.
>      
>     Just my opinion.
>     ed
>
>     Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>
>         What follows is an exchange of e-mails between Lance Van
>         Nostrand, the
>         List, John Fuqua and me. If it comes through as presented, John's
>         comments are in blue.
>
>         Ron Van Putte
>
>         From: johnfuqua at gdsys.net
>         Subject: RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote
>         Date: May 11, 2004 8:50:34 PM CDT
>         To: vanputte at cox.net
>
>         From: Ron Van Putte
>             **  Klipped 4 reposting..  **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040512/975e9de0/attachment.html