YS Engines
Dean Pappas
d.pappas at kodeos.com
Mon Mar 29 06:06:34 AKST 2004
An excellent answer, Eric.
It begs the question as to whether they dominate like they did through the nineties: you know ... during the last century.
Hi to All,
Dean P.
-----Original Message-----
From: Henderson,Eric [mailto:Eric.Henderson at gartner.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 10:03 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: RE: YS Engines
To answer the question. "Ok, time for another newbie question: it seems to me from the discussion and contest results and a few copies of the K factor that Kane gave me at the D4 contest last year that pattern pilots prefer YS engines, yet YS engines don't seem to dominate in other kinds of flying(IMAC, scale, fun fly, etc). Um, why?
>
> Ed Hernandez "
basically:-
1. YS engines are too small for IMAC and teasingly so too quiet :-)
2. Fun Fly's are not a 1.40 type event if you are talking wild tasks?
3. Scale is not an engine power event.
Regards,
Eric.
Message to Ed Hartley - I can't seem to stop these mail loops. I get bunches of reject messages and b=never see my own posts. I will unsubscribe accordingly.
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Dean Pappas
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:48 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: RE: YS Engines
Ah yes! ... the subtle distinction between complication and sophistication.
Do you notice, though, that the guys who had their 4-Cs running well art generally the guys with the nicely running 2-Cs?
The question is not, "What to run?", but, "How to run it?"
Somewhere at the beginning of this thread, someone asked what he should run ... and one workable answer might be to latch onto someone local who has got his act together, and learn from him. This may not involve duplication, either.
Regards,
Dean
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hunt [mailto:flyintexan at houston.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 11:46 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: YS Engines
Simplicity is not a word you want attached to your high-tech pattern aircraft anyway....
----- Original Message -----
From: Lance Van Nostrand <mailto:patterndude at comcast.net>
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: YS Engines
Jim,
I'll bet by now you can assemble and disassemble the 15 moving parts that make up just the head of that engine with your eyes closed. It's a zen like procedure that brings comfort and joy.
My engine only has one part (glow plug) and it doesn't move. while you're doing that I'll have to find something else to tinker with....[where's the wife.....]
--Lance
----- Original Message -----
From: jim ivey <mailto:jivey61 at msn.com>
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: YS Engines
Lance
Guess I am getting soothed then. I just started the 3rd rebuild on a YS 140L.It has 450 flights on it.
Jim Ivey
jivey61 at msn.com
>From: "Lance Van Nostrand" < patterndude at comcast.net>
>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>To: < discussion at nsrca.org>
>Subject: Re: YS Engines
>Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:24:32 -0600
>
>Ed,
>Pattern guys love to tinker. If they are not adjusting something, replacing something, or doing periodic maintenance, they feel lost. Therefore, YS engines help soothe the pattern mind.
>--Lance
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Edward C. Hernandez
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 9:55 PM
> Subject: YS Engines
>
>
> Ok, time for another newbie question: it seems to me from the discussion and contest results and a few copies of the K factor that Kane gave me at the D4 contest last year that pattern pilots prefer YS engines, yet YS engines don't seem to dominate in other kinds of flying(IMAC, scale, fun fly, etc). Um, why?
>
> Ed Hernandez
_____
All the action. All the <http://g.msn.com/8HMAENUS/2746??PS=> drama. Get NCAA hoops coverage at MSN Sports by ESPN.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040329/d471c3f5/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list