Artistic Aerobatics suggestions

David Harmon K6XYZ at comcast.net
Mon Jan 26 08:28:06 AKST 2004


I agree with the below...I think the AA idea is silly anyway as well as
having an announcer for the 'spectators'.
These contests are not TOC type events that draw crowds from all over,
these contests are local and interest in them will probably be limited
as far as 'spectators' are concerned.
 
Regards

Dave Harmon
NSRCA 586
K6XYZ[at]comcast[dot]net
Torrance, Ca. 
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of MargueriteVG at aol.com
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 7:14 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Artistic Aerobatics suggestions
 
 less pattern  contest events and split dedication because of a new
"group" is one of the reasons why I agree   that  we should not move to
quickly into Artistic Aerobatics if at all?
Marguerite
 
 
In a message dated 1/25/2004 7:42:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
Divesplat1 at msn.com writes:
 
 
I am also terribly against trying to have a freestyle, AA portion Sunday
afternoon.  Here is my reasoning.
1)  Many contests we attend don't fly all 6 rounds as it is(this really
upsets me even though I have driven a distance.  Stay till 3 and finish
the whole thing is my idea, but many differ.)
 
2)  To add AA would only either extend the time people were there and
still not finishing the pattern contests, or end up loosing more pattern
contest for something new and different.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040126/2b9c7060/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list