Artistic Aerobatics and future thinking

Bill Glaze billglaze at triad.rr.com
Sat Jan 24 19:19:29 AKST 2004


Adam:
Interesting concept; I think it could be made workable.  Bill Glaze

Adam Glatt wrote:

> I think Eric has a good idea by making the pattern more controlled by 
> those who fly it.  Another way to accomplish this is to allow the 
> pilot to become more involved.  Am I the only one who has noticed that 
> some of the most frequently asked questions are about rule changes, 
> proposals, and the time schedule of the whole thing?  As the SIG in 
> AMA for precision aerobatics, it seems this should be a function of 
> the nsrca.org website.  Not a big change, but if we think a degree of 
> dynamism is going to make pattern more enjoyable (which I think it can 
> without sacrificing its existing qualities), this seems a useful 
> step.  Maybe district websites could have monthly polls where pilots 
> in the district vote for the upcoming contest's unknown maneuver 
> (though a vote of hands at the pilots meeting should probably decide it).
>
> How about an Unknown class at the Nats?  Open to anyone, fly two 
> rounds, one pattern, a little easier than the World's unknowns to make 
> it possible for many to fly (no three opposite rolls rolling circle), 
> and fly it twice to make improvement important.  Sounds like more fun 
> than AA to me.
>
>
>
> Henderson,Eric wrote:
>
>> %good stuff snipped%
>> I'll leave you hanging there because the next part is 
>> yours...anticipate then suggest.
>>  
>> Regards,
>>
>> Eric.
>
>
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to # 
> discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list