Artistic Aerobatics and future thinking
Bill Glaze
billglaze at triad.rr.com
Sat Jan 24 19:19:29 AKST 2004
Adam:
Interesting concept; I think it could be made workable. Bill Glaze
Adam Glatt wrote:
> I think Eric has a good idea by making the pattern more controlled by
> those who fly it. Another way to accomplish this is to allow the
> pilot to become more involved. Am I the only one who has noticed that
> some of the most frequently asked questions are about rule changes,
> proposals, and the time schedule of the whole thing? As the SIG in
> AMA for precision aerobatics, it seems this should be a function of
> the nsrca.org website. Not a big change, but if we think a degree of
> dynamism is going to make pattern more enjoyable (which I think it can
> without sacrificing its existing qualities), this seems a useful
> step. Maybe district websites could have monthly polls where pilots
> in the district vote for the upcoming contest's unknown maneuver
> (though a vote of hands at the pilots meeting should probably decide it).
>
> How about an Unknown class at the Nats? Open to anyone, fly two
> rounds, one pattern, a little easier than the World's unknowns to make
> it possible for many to fly (no three opposite rolls rolling circle),
> and fly it twice to make improvement important. Sounds like more fun
> than AA to me.
>
>
>
> Henderson,Eric wrote:
>
>> %good stuff snipped%
>> I'll leave you hanging there because the next part is
>> yours...anticipate then suggest.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Eric.
>
>
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to #
> discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list