T-BIRD ACCIDENT

[spbyrum]

Isn't the 0 mandatory because of parts falling off on exit???

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of Wayne Galligan
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 7:24 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: T-BIRD ACCIDENT

I think a zero would be appropriate in this situation as he went below
the
15 feet minimum altitude.  At least a serious downgrade of at least 4pts
plus 1pt for every foot under the ground he went.

WG

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Pastorello" <rcaerobob at cox.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: T-BIRD ACCIDENT


> So was it a "six", or a "zero" (for failure to perform correct
maneuver)???
>
> Bob Pastorello, Oklahoma
> NSRCA 199, AMA 46373
> rcaerobob at cox.net
> www.rcaerobats.net
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at cox.net>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:08 PM
> Subject: Re: T-BIRD ACCIDENT
>
>
> >
> > On Feb 26, 2004, at 6:00 PM, Del K. Rykert wrote:
> >
> > > Gives new meaning to screwed that one up doesn't it. Also makes
many
> > > of us
> > > pattern pilots feel not so bad when we do mess up a little.
> >
> > Did you notice that he didn't center the half roll?  If he'd
extended
> > the inverted part of the maneuver, he'd have been fine.
> >
> > Ron Van Putte
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "David Harmon" <K6XYZ at comcast.net>
> > > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 6:46 PM
> > > Subject: RE: T-BIRD ACCIDENT
> > >
> > >
> > > The one I REALLY like is the doofus that tried to tow the
boat...HAW
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Dave Harmon
> > > NSRCA 586
> > > K6XYZ[at]comcast[dot]net
> > > Torrance, Ca.
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> > > On Behalf Of Wayne Galligan
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 3:06 PM
> > > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > > Subject: Re: T-BIRD ACCIDENT
> > >
> > > luved the extreme landing by the md80
> > > looks kinda like some of my not so perfect approaches.
> > >
> > > WG
> > >
> > >
> > > ============# To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> > >
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>


=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#




=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#