Lancaster?

Wayne Galligan wgalligan at goodsonacura.com
Thu Feb 12 05:21:24 AKST 2004


Kinda like Jepordy huh?

WG

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: David Harmon 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 7:23 PM
  Subject: RE: Lancaster?


  Occasionally, there is a considerable delay before the server will send to all subscribers.

  There may be an answer to the original post before the server sends the original post to the original poster..

  Uhhh..I think I said that right..

  That's why there was an answer to Jim's post before Jim's post was posted...jeeeze.

  Regards

  Dave Harmon
  NSRCA 586
  K6XYZ[at]comcast[dot]net
  Torrance, Ca. 

  -----Original Message-----
  From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of JOddino
  Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 12:51 PM
  To: discussion at nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: Lancaster?

   

  This is the one I sent that I didn't see come back:

   

  Troy,

  Great report.  I can't believe you flew on Sat.  My computer said the winds were 25 gusting to 30 all day.

  Seems to me the electric's consistency from beginning to the end of flight could be an advantage.  The speed should be selectable with gear ratios and prop pitches so that should end up a plus also.  I think electrics will be a shot in the arm for pattern but like you say it still needs to be proven before the masses will follow.  It took 4 strokes a long time to be accepted but people eventually figure out what works best.

   

   

  Wondering if I screwed up and it never got out.

  Jim

     
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040212/d88cc8ae/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list