Displacement during snaps ** del klipped for reposting **

Doug Cronkhite seefo at san.rr.com
Wed Dec 29 12:38:28 AKST 2004


Honestly there are a lot of pilots at the TOC who's snaps I would zero. By
far the biggest obstacle is getting the criteria applied uniformly across
all pilots. If I snap an airplane like some pilots I've seen, I'll get a
zero where they get high scores.
 
-Doug 

  _____  

From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of Del Rykert
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 7:05 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Displacement during snaps ** del klipped for reposting **


If I were judging Somenzini's snap from what I have read described so far it
would earn a zero. As was previously clearly stated on this list a true snap
must show a discernable break. That means to me that the aircraft must
demonstrate a shift. The question of how much I think is semantics as I
wasn't born with calibrated eyeballs and haven't been able to train them to
become such. If I were judging a snap and saw a shift of more than 2 1/2
wing spans I would suspect it would be entering a barrel roll. Purely
conjecture on my part. 
    Great thread.
 
        del
----- Original Message ----- 
From: John Ferrell <mailto:johnferrell at earthlink.net>  
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: Displacement during snap rolls (was Why is it so quiet?)

As near as I can tell Somenzini's secret is in the setup, not the snap
itself. 
The only place I see to downgrade for offset is in presentation.
 
I admit to being one of his fans.
 
I think the question is a very good one!
 
John Ferrell    
http://DixieNC.US

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Bob  <mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net> Pastorello 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: Displacement during snap rolls (was Why is it so quiet?)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041229/989a2c09/attachment-0001.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list