[SPAM] Re: Displacement during snap rolls (was Why is it so quiet?)

[Dean Pappas]

I suspect that the omission was on purpose!

Dean Pappas
Sr. Design Engineer
Kodeos Communications
111 Corporate Blvd.
South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
(908) 222-7817 phone
(908) 222-2392 fax
d.pappas at kodeos.com


-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of rcaerobob at cox.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 1:56 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Re: [SPAM] Re: Displacement during snap rolls (was Why is
it so quiet?)


This is another example of the intent of a thread wandering far afoot....as the original questioner, I'd like to refocus my point.
Simply put - according to our CURRENT rules, there is NOT a downgrade criterion for offsetting of the track during a snap maneuver.
  I understand the "more skillful" guy should get a point reward (by not getting a downgrade that others may receive), but my point is ----
  What is the rule basis for the downgrade?
  And since I'm specifically talking about LATERAL track offsets, not vertical or angular, there aren't "general" guidelines to handle this.
  My point being that there SHOULD NOT be a scored difference between the line that shifts and the line that doesn't, all other factors being identical between the quality of the two snaps.....simply because we don't have the criteria identified.

Or am I just being logical again?
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.