Excelleron with OS 91FX in Intermediate ?
george kennie
geobet at gis.net
Wed Dec 22 11:54:17 AKST 2004
For me it was a combination. I saw one fly in Oct. in a pretty stiff
crosswind and was quite impressed how well it appeared to handle. Then
the price was in the area that I felt was more than reasonable so I went
for it. I still have to come up with a better exhaust arrangement than I
am currently employing as I would like to be a little quieter.
G.
Bob Pastorello wrote:
> The 1.20 class two-strokes in this airplane will probably provide the
> best power at the lightest overall weight. The ST is overkill, and
> added about 8-9 oz overall more than should have been there, because
> it starts out at 31 oz, then add the exhaust system. Most of the
> 1.20's, I think, are coming in at 31-33 oz WITH exhaust systems, and
> that reduces wing loading about 2 oz/sq.ft. I'm ready to test hop,
> awaiting the header, which is in process. It is surprising to see
> this one design catch on so rapidly. Was it price? Performance?
> Bob Pastorello
> NSRCA 199 AMA 46373
> rcaerobob at cox.net
> www.rcaerobats.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Randy
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 9:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Excelleron with OS 91FX in Intermediate ?
> I order a Tiger Shark 1.20 for my excelleron90. Should be
> about right.Randy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul Horan
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 6:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Excelleron with OS 91FX in
> Intermediate ?
> Bruce, Thanks, that's what I am concerned
> about. The OS 91 FX most likely will require a
> pipe to do the job and the Excelleronis not set up
> for a pipe. I may have to resort to a larger 2
> stroke engine. Bob Pastorello is using a Super
> Tiger 2300.Not sure I wish to go that big
> !Thanks,Paul
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pattrnflyr at aol.com
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Excelleron with OS 91FX in
> Intermediate ?
> I have a scratch built Typhoon 909 that
> weighs around 8 to 8.5 pounds. The
> "Littlephoon" has 909 square inches of
> wing, about a 70 inch wing span. I fly
> intermediate at 5500 feet MSL. The YS91
> did not have enough to fly the Int
> pattern, because of the two maneuvers
> you mentioned. I put a YS 110 in the
> Littlephoon, and now I have plenty of
> power swinging a 15X8. I have no
> experience with the OS, but I would
> think the YS would be a little
> lacking. See ya,
>
> Bruce
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041222/0dbcbabf/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list