Fw: Ellection process - use the bylaws it's easier
Wincons at aol.com
Wincons at aol.com
Sun Dec 19 20:19:26 AKST 2004
In a message dated 12/19/2004 10:53:20 PM Central Standard Time,
pattern4u at comcast.net writes:
Eric,
>>
>> As the primary author of the bylaws is there anything in there that says
>> we
>> can not mail out new ballots to those that did not receive theirs? Just
>> curious because I can't see anything that precludes us from doing that...
>> The only thing I'm aware of is that the ballots need to be mailed back by
>> 12/31. If you read Jim Ivey's note to me at the bottom you'll see that
>> he
>> says what I am doing is illegal - I disagree. I'm not proposing changing
>> anything about the voting process just the fact that we'd like to get
>> ballots in the hands of those that didn't get them.
>>
>> -Derek
One other thing puzzles me..... why are YOU being accused, Derek? You are
NOT the president, you are NOT the Secretary. So why are you being sighted in
on about ballots, and why is it your problem to remedy? Turn it over to
Tony, and tell everybody to get off your back about it. Maybe next time we'll
all be on you, but not this time. ;) (and you do have to win this election,
first! It could still be Lamar, you know....)
Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041220/5e13d998/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list