NSRCA Voting Process

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

On target Bob, I agree. For this go around, we the Board simply did not  have 
the time to make the count electronic. The next president should address  
electronic balloting. 
 
The sticky wicket will be the people who are not connected of course, just  
like the electronic KFactor debates of two years ago. But I believe we can work 
 around that. 
 
 Do you know what it would cost to set-up and who could do it? Wayne,  do 
you? 
 
Thanks
 
Matt
 
In a message dated 12/15/2004 10:22:07 AM Eastern Standard Time,  
wgalligan at goodsonacura.com writes:

I have  to agree Bob.

If you can send your C/card # over the internet with  security I cant see why
we cant have a simple voting system in place that  would be as secure.  You
could have a basic system setup for any type  of polling or voting and the
results could be kept in a data base for all  to review.  Use the NSRCA
website to hold such  inforamtion.

Wayne G.


----- Original Message ----- 
From:  <rcaerobob at cox.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent:  Wednesday, December 15, 2004 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: NSRCA Voting  Process


> Which is a DANG good reason to go electronic,  server/secure authentication
access voting for issues in the future.   It's just too easy to do now...and
too cheap to ignore.
>
> For  the future, maybe????
>
> BOb p.
> >
> > From:  Rcmaster199 at aol.com
> > Date: 2004/12/15 Wed AM 10:02:12 EST
>  > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > Subject: Fwd: NSRCA Voting  Process
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank  you, that was my point. Plus our stamps to mail the ballots  back,
(a
> > hidden overall cost). The whole project cost could  easily exceed $800.
> >
> > Let's make it count folks.  PLEASE VOTE!!
> >
> > MattK


 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041215/c0974e9e/attachment.html