Shock and Bewilderment
Del Rykert
drykert at rochester.rr.com
Wed Sep 24 08:25:30 AKDT 2003
Hi Anthony.
Intelligence often wins out and people agree.. (vbg)
Del
----- Original Message -----
From: Anthony Romano
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 5:12 PM
Subject: Shock and Bewilderment
Was I too stunned to read this correctly! Did Ed and Eric just agree on
somethin?
Anthony
>From: "Henderson,Eric" <Eric.Henderson at gartner.com>
>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>Subject: District Championships - tuning.
>Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:19:17 -0400
>
>It works with each district having it's own championship design and method.
>There was a time when not all districts had one. We have progressed from
>that point in time. It also had to be a flexible formula because of
>District sizes and membership distribution geographically.
>
>I said it works. Of course that is until a quirk appears for which we did
>not anticipate or for which did not write a rule.
>
>It's only toy aeroplanes, but the competition aspect does bring out some of
>our less desirable human traits. A hint of the unfair can raise the bile
>and get the gourd of the most mild and placid.
>
>One issue that I had to deal with was the including of a Canadian contest
>in a USA NSRCA district championship - very tricky - we had encouraged
>Canada to adopt the US Masters and Advanced schedules, (They already had
>FAI), to promote cross-border competing. That one was resolved by the
>ruling that only AMA sanctioned contests counted. (It already is that way
>in the USA but we needed to apply it to resolve Canadian contests inclusion
>objections)
>
>As regards joining "late" to secure a championship. It is clear that we
>want to find as many ways as possible to get folks to join the NSRCA. In
>the case below it worked, but at what price. It could clearly hurt existing
>members and even cause resignations etc. I would say that it needs
>clarification or de-quirking for next year!
>
>My internal personal justice system thinks that only contests after you
>join should count. But then you have to define when does a person actually
>join and how do they prove it.... Sending in your application ten minutes
>before a district Championship might be cutting it a bit fine :-)
>
>Regards,
>
>Eric.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Wayne Galligan
>Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:46 AM
>To: discussion at nsrca.org
>Subject: NSRCA WEBSITE
>
>
>Resending this... may not have gone through first time.
>
>Speaking of reading the NSRCA list. Is the format for the district
>championship going to be standardized anytime soon? I came to realize the
>district championship format posted there is just a guideline that Tony S.
>proposed. It has created a little stir in my class in D6 mainly because of
>me procrastinating my enrollment till after the first two contest. Wouldnt
>you know I won those two contests. I though the proposed standards where
>what we where using and therefore my mistake. I have come to find out that
>the districts are setting the guidelines. Should we not have a standard
>format across the board for the championship? I liked the proposal that
>Tony suggests.
>
>Wayne Galligan
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Del Rykert
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 12:20 PM
> Subject: Re: NSRCA Formal Announcement
>
>
> But no all new joiners and even some don't read this list and should
>still
>have that info as part of joining the organization. Those that are left out
>tend to develop a nasty taste in their mouth for being ignored or not part
>of the elite. Many social organizations I have been associated with in my
>life have done this and has always come back to bite them in the butt.
>
> Del K. Rykert
> AMA - 8928
> NSRCA - 473
> Kb2joi - General
>
>
>=====================================
># To be removed from this list, send a message to
># discussion-request at nsrca.org
># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>#
>
>====================================# To be removed from this list, send a
>message to
># discussion-request at nsrca.org
># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>#
>
_________________________________________________________________
Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now
FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030924/5a063e59/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list