QUEST update
Henderson,Eric
Eric.Henderson at gartner.com
Thu Sep 11 07:42:10 AKDT 2003
I'll wait for you:-) You'll have 3 minutes to start your engine. ;-)))
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of randy10926 at comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:47 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: RE: QUEST update
Thanks. Plan on starting by 6am. Should be in time for engine startup.
Randy
> 3 hrs to the field from Arcola - medium traffic at 6.8 am busier later. Take NJ
> turnpike at Delaware Memorial bridge...
>
>
> - ----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of randy10926 at comcast.net
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 12:44 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: RE: QUEST update
>
>
> Thinking about driving up Saturday morning for your contest. How bad was the
> traffic? How long did it take you and at what speed?
>
> Is your club dog friendly?
>
> Randy
> > I bought it from Michael Laggis who posted it on this list.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of randy10926 at comcast.net
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:18 AM
> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > Subject: RE: QUEST update
> >
> >
> > where did you get the YS 110 from?
> >
> > Randy
> > > I now have two Quests. One is being fitted with the YS 110, That way I will
> > have
> > > data on the YS 91, 110 and 140 powered versions. Anyone with a 1.20 FZ
> running
> > > one out there?.
> > >
> > > The YS 91 version was great to fly. I modified it to take the 1.40 (1.20
> AC's
> > > too heavy IMHO) and I did not have a 110 at the time. I have seen a 1.20 OS
> > 4-c
> > > version and a 91 OS 2-c version. I have had a few calls about the old YS 91
> > AC's
> > > not behaving well but no complaints about the flying capabilities of the
> > plane.
> > >
> > > One guy lost his canopy. I do and also advise gluing it on with RC56 and
> > ironing
> > > on a trim strip to keep it in place. Both the std gear supplied and my old
> > > Bolly's continue to work well. I do now advise adding (I may have already) a
> > > 1/8-3/16" hard ply plate on top of the original gear plate to prevent pull
> > > through. I also fit 1/8" lite ply doublers before and aft of the front wing
> > > former - call it instinct. (I have picture if that I can e-mail direct - the
> > > list won't take them)
> > >
> > > All in all the plane continues to be an excellent flyer. I asked Don Szczur
> to
> > > fly it at Arcola this year. He increased all the throws and was very
> > > comfortable with it. Maybe he can comment on the flying - he needed more
> > > elevator that I had mechanically not allowed for.
> > >
> > > I let an IMAC pilot fly it and he found it too smooth and boring for his
> > tastes
> > > - fine by me :-)
> > >
> > > My plane still has no Knife edge or down line problems and runs with no
> > > corrective mixes, even though it is a bit nose heavy with the 1.40.
> > >
> > > BTW - you do NOT need a 1.40 on the front. The vertical is obscene and it
> will
> > > teach you bad habits. A 91 FZ (Note FZ), a 110 or a 1.20 FZ. Saito 100 etc.
> > are
> > > very good. An OS 91 Surpass will do it for 401/402 but does not have the
> > up-line
> > > grunt if you want to fly big.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Eric.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Larry Caldwell
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 12:10 AM
> > > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > > Subject: Re: QUEST update
> > >
> > >
> > > Any more thoughts on the Quest now that you have had it a while?
> > > I'm looking to buy a 90 size pattern plane to begin in Sportsman.
> > > Right now it's a toss-up between the Quest and a Zimpro Viper 90FG.
> > >
> > > Larry
> > >
> > > Henderson,Eric wrote:
> > > > The Quest continues to be put through the wringer!
> > > >
> > > > With 38 more flights on it I have only had to tighten the tailwheel wire
> > > > in the rudder. A few drops of Zap did the trick.
> > > >
> > > > The throttle hook up has not been very well behaved. Against my better
> > > > judgement I used an EZ connector at the throttle arm end. The first
> > > > failure was on the ground, while tethered. Full rpm on engine start.
> > > > Saved the day by backing out the needle until the engine quit. The black
> > > > keeper washer had come off. Fitted a new one. 12 flights later the darn
> > > > thing came off in the air. The brass part must have also been worn,
> > > >
> > > > 11 minutes of full bore flying later it ran out of gas.
> > > >
> > > > All I could do was fly large horizontal figure 8's until tank empty
> > > > status occurred. Boy does that tire you out! You dare not gain height
> > > > nor can you roll much at that speed.
> > > >
> > > > Good news is that the plane held together at a faster than I would ever
> > > > fly it speed. Two bits of trim began to peel but will be re-ironed
> > > > tonight. Wing and fuse and elevator/ rudder all behaved flawlessly
> > > > during the un-planned "stress-test". Pilot was not so firm afterwards.
> > > >
> > > > Throttle wire hook up will be replaced with my own system tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > I am currently flying the plane with all controls 40% below the minimum
> > > > recommended and it will roll and snap and spin in a very happy manner,
> > > > No KE or down line mixes have been found to be necessary. One cool thing
> > > > is that the plane will do real square KE loops. On the down line you go
> > > > to full rudder and blip the gas and there you are flying level. To much
> > > > fun for one guy!
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Eric.
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> > >
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> > >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
==================# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list