Schedules

[Bill Glaze]

Ron;
I seem to recall that the idea of more frequent sequence changes was 
widely approved class-wide.
As I recall  the numbers were about 3 to 1 in favor (roughly.)  I can 
dig through my  paperwork to find the results if others dispute my numbers
As far as individual proposals go, for something like sequences, which 
are so important, have they not been composed in the past by a committee 
who has been charged with that task?  Rather than by an individual?
I hoped that this would have been done on the time line of this rules 
cycle.  Admittedly, I had heard nothing about this being worked on, but 
felt that said (apparently nonexistent) committee would present us with 
their work when ready.

Bill Glaze

Ron Van Putte wrote:

>
>
> Bill Glaze wrote:
>
>> I noted that only the AMA Masters class seem to be applying for a new 
>> schedule.
>> One of the reasons for change was stated as  being that  a majority 
>> of the membership voted for change.
>> The same vote tabulation stated that the other classes also wished to 
>> see a schedule change.
>> Is this currently being worked on?
>
>
>
> Proposals for changes to the current 401 - 403 maneuver schedules were 
> not submitted to the AMA by NSRCA.  However, IF the NSRCA Annex 
> proposal passes, we will have the option of changes to all maneuver 
> schedules as frequently as annually.
>
> I don't remember that a majority 'voted' for changes to schedules 
> other than the Master class.  Even so, any AMA member can submit a 
> change proposal.  I have submitted several as an individual over the 
> years. One was for the takeoff direction being the pilot's option.  I 
> submitted it three times before it finally passed on the third try, 
> but it did pass.  So, individual proposals do get through.  People 
> need to make proposals if they see the need for change and not rely on 
> someone doing it for them.
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Bill Glaze
>>
>> =====================================
>> # To be removed from this list, send a message to # 
>> discussion-request at nsrca.org
>> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>> #
>>
>>
>
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to # 
> discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>


=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#