Bigger issues--Long as usual from me

[george kennie]

I'll give you 3 guesses. The first two don't count.   Of course, of course!
G.

"Henderson,Eric" wrote:

> Did you support the NSRCA voted proposals?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of george kennie
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:32 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Bigger issues--Long as usual from me
>
> My responce to every individual proposal, accompanied by the reasons for my
> position went out by e-mail to the District 1 representative about ten
> minutes ago.
> Takes a significant effort guys, but if you do it they can't say that they
> didn't know how you wanted them to vote. Time to bite the bullet!
> Georgie
>
> Tony Stillman wrote:
>
> > Marty:
> >
> > The Annex proposal is out there now.  That will pretty much solve the
> > problem of schedules, if it passes.  I hope you have contacted your AMA
> > Contest Board member and told him you want him to vote for this proposal.
> >
> > Tony Stillman
> > Radio South
> > 3702 N. Pace Blvd.
> > Pensacola, FL 32505
> > 1-800-962-7802
> > www.radiosouthrc.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" <moleski at canisius.edu>
> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: Bigger issues--Long as usual from me
> >
> > > --On Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:03 PM -0600 Tony Stillman
> > <tony at radiosouthrc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's pretty easy to type notes to this list, but
> > > > much more difficult to decide to do everything ourselves.
> > >
> > > I suppose that thinking about modifying schedules on an
> > > annual basis is more work than doing so on a three-year
> > > cycle.
> > >
> > > But you guys with the talent to create schedules do a
> > > heck of a lot of work getting ready for the trienniel
> > > review.  I'm not sure how shortening the list of
> > > approving bodies is more work.
> > >
> > > > Am I getting a signal from this mailing list that we need to
> > > > remove ourselves from AMA and do everything ourselves?
> > >
> > > Not "everything."
> > >
> > > Not F3A.
> > >
> > > "Just" formulation and promulgation of schedules for
> > > NSRCA contests.
> > >
> > > Nats: dunno.  Does the AMA Contest Board want to run
> > > its own nats with its own schedules?
> > >
> > > Marty #2874
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
> ====================================# To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#