Bigger Issues (one more time)

[Tony Stillman]

Jerry:

First, NSRCA is a SIG of AMA, so, yes, we are part of AMA.  What you are
really saying is that NSRCA wants total control of the rules making process,
especially in the AMA events.  I think everyone on this list agrees with
that!  I now appears that AMA may be more willing than in past years to at
least talk about it.

The BIG problem is that a large bureaucratic organization never wants to
relinquish power!

Hopefully, we will be able to make strides in this direction in the next few
years...

Tony Stillman
Radio South
3702 N. Pace Blvd.
Pensacola, FL 32505
1-800-962-7802
www.radiosouthrc.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Budd" <jbudd at QNET.COM>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: Bigger Issues (one more time)


> OK, I'll try and explain it one more time.
>
> I'm NOT advocating that NSRCA succeed from AMA (NSRCA can't as it's
> not part of AMA).
>
> I'm suggesting that NSRCA consider holding its own competition events
> in leu of Sportsman - Masters.  F3A would continue to be held exactly
> as the F3A rules require (including obtaining an AMA sanction for
> F3A).  That way NSRCA can continue to support those who are
> accumulating points for the US F3A Team Selection Program.
>
> It's important that NSRCA continue to support the F3A competitors.
> It's equally important that NSRCA support those who fly Sportsman -
> Masters.  It is my opinion that NSRCA can best support the Sportsman
> - Masters competitors from "outside" the AMA system.  F3A is a
> different situation as AMA is the official FAI representative for
> aeromodeling within the US.  Accordingly, F3A can only be
> administered and supported from within the AMA system.  That's
> appropriate as FAI is the governing body for international
> competition.  AMA simply acts as the administrator in the US and has
> no more voice in FAI matters than NSRCA does.
>
> But they can coexist, at the same contest (we do it now).  The only
> difference would be the organizational structure behind the non-F3A
> classes being offered would be handled by NSRCA, and the process a CD
> would follow to offer both events would change slightly.
>
> Beyond that little would change.
>
> But I could be wrong (Hey to Marty!)
>
> Thx, Jerry
>
>
> >I understand you guys want suceed (sp?)  from the union...Hey living here
in
> >Atlanta I can understand that a little.
> >
> >But here is a problem with events that don't sanctions. As a member of
the
> >F3A team selection program, this past cycle candidates were required to
> >compete is 5 contests in order to qualify for the Finals event. Now this
> >setup is to help promote F3A on a local contest level. We had a year plus
> >some to get these 5 contests in....I know of one guy that had to travel
> >about 1000 miles to an event....another event for this card punch.....The
> >reason he had to travel this long distance to a contest is because a
local
> >contest in his district which he attended last fall was not a sanctioned
> >event. Therefore it could not be counted. He almost missed the TSC
because
> >of a NSRCA run contest that was not sanctioned by AMA.
> >
> >Now as for John's comment about F3A guys not supporting local events....I
> >don't know what to say other than I personally attended 13 contests this
> >year! 11 of which were local events. These were from California, Arizona,
> >Nevada, out to Florida, Alabama, Carolinas, and Indiana.
> >
> >Some of my fellow F3A competitors don't do this. I wish they did!
> >
> >In the next Team Selection cycle if I attend an event to get my card
punched
> >and find out its not a AMA event and therefore nothing more than a fun
> >fly....I doubt I will ever return to that contest out of frustration.
> >
> >
> >Just some of the results of these actions. You can take your marbles and
go
> >home...but I think its foolish.
> >
> >Troy
>
> -- 
> ___________
> Jerry Budd
> mailto:jbudd at qnet.com
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#