Bigger issues--Long as usual from me

Ron Van Putte vanputte at cox.net
Wed Nov 19 11:11:24 AKST 2003


On Nov 19, 2003, at 12:53 PM, Bill Glaze wrote:

> And, if this situation really happens, once again the wrong people 
> will be in control of the  Annex.  It might just as well not have been 
> written.

As far as I can tell, NSRCA will do all the annex work and the contest 
board will only "sprinkle holy water" on our work.  I do not believe 
that the contest board members (most are NSRCA members) would ever put 
a veto on anything we wanted to do.  It's just that the AMA hierarchy 
is unwilling to relinquish any more control over the rule book than 
they' inadvertently gave the IMACers in the last cycle.  The process 
WILL take longer, because it takes time to "sprinkle holy water".

Ron Van Putte

>
> Ron Van Putte wrote:
>
>> John Ferrell wrote that we should  "declare independence in the same 
>> manner as the IMAC folks".  I tried to do that with my annex 
>> proposal.  The proposal would have taken the maneuver descriptions 
>> and maneuver schedules out of contest board-control in the rule book 
>> and into an NSRCA-controlled annex.  The proposal precipitated an 
>> energetic response from the AMA Executive Council.  They had not 
>> initially realized the freedom that the IMAC folks had been granted 
>> in the previous rule change cycle and, when my proposal asked for the 
>> same freedom to act that the IMAC people already have, it was met 
>> with a swift and firm rejection.  I declined to have any part in a 
>> compromise proposal giving the contest board control of the annex.  
>> John Fuqua and Tony Stillman decided to reissue my proposal, 
>> returning control of the annex to the contest board.
>>
>> Ron Van Putte
>>
>> =====================================
>> # To be removed from this list, send a message to # 
>> discussion-request at nsrca.org
>> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>> #
>>
>>
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to # 
> discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list