Rule Change Survey Results

[george kennie]

I realize that you're the co-signer, Ron, but you're willing to make the
results of the survey exposed to the board for which you have my admiration.
As I said, "very fair."
   Yup, I read all 20 proposals and made up a responce sheet which I will
send to my district rep as per Tony's directive. Took me about 3&1/2 hours.
I don't know how many guys are going to be able to devote that kind of time
to respond to the document.
Am I correct in my understanding that it is too late to submit a
counter-proposal to be considered on this go-round?
Georgie

Ron Van Putte wrote:

> On Nov 14, 2003, at 12:34 PM, george kennie wrote:
>
> > Gee, it sounds like Mr.Fuqua is not even interested in the concerns of
> > our group in spite of the fact that he's listed in my copy of M.A. as
> > being the rep for district 5. I notice that he does not seem to want
> > the rest of the board to gain exposure to the survey results. Could
> > that
> > be because he's the originator of the proposal in question?
>
> He is the originator of the rule change proposal to have 0 or 10 for
> takeoffs/landings.  I also signed the proposal.
>
> > Does he even monitor this list, which is a voice of a group of which
> > he is a member?
>
> No.  There is too much traffic that is not appropriate to his interest.
>
> > How does he keep up with the heartbeat of his constituents.  He must
> > represent a very small geographical district and be able to contact
> > everyone by word of mouth. And this guy is the chairman of the
> > board?????  I must be missing something here somewhere!!! Somebody
> > correct my error here. I' ve got to be wrong......(AGAIN).
> >
>
> He is like every other member of the contest board.  He responds to
> input from constituents who contact him.  He contacted me three times
> by email today because I contacted him three times.  His home e-mail
> address is johnfuqua at gdsys.net   BTW, I don't think that AMA District 5
> is a small geographic district.  It encompasses Alabama, Florida,
> Georgia, Mississippi, Puerto Rico, South Carolina and Tennessee.
>
> Permit me an aside.  If all the effort which went into the hand
> wringing we've seen on this List about the takeoff and landing rule
> change proposal went into constructive activity, we could get some real
> work done in support of NSRCA.   Did anyone actually log on Tony's site
> and read the proposal?
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#