Rule Change Survey Results
Gene Maurice
gene.maurice at comcast.net
Sat Nov 15 10:27:40 AKST 2003
Can someone please explain to me why the rules proposal, submission, voting,
approval, and implementation process takes so long. There is nearly 2 1/2
years from conception to birth. Hell, elephant gestation is only 22
months!!!!
I'm not taking shots at anyone, just curious why it takes so long.
Gene Maurice
gene.maurice at comcast.net
Plano, TX
AMA 3408
NSRCA 877
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
Behalf Of Lance Van Nostrand
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 12:42 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Rule Change Survey Results
I wonder now if Georgie is right in his assessment of the politics. This
is an amazingly odd comment by the chairman of the contest board about the
NSRCA rules survey:
"From 2002. An old survey before the rules proposals were available to
the membership. In my mind I am not sure it is still valid. Do not think
there was a "2004" survey or 2003 for that matter.
John
As we have learned the hard way, the voting occurring this April 2004 is
based on rules proposals wording finalized in Sept 2002 and that were
approved in July 2003 to be on the ballot in April 2004. Any member surveys
after Sept 2002 are moot. We shouldn't discount the survey since it is the
only official accounting of member opinion collected before the cutoff. The
April vote is the opportunity to determine if the proper proposals made long
ago should become rules.
If John feels the 2002 survey is no longer valid, on what is he basing
that opinion? Seems to me all the evidence shows that the 2002 survey
results are still valid.
--Lance
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron Van Putte
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: Fwd: Rule Change Survey Results
NSRCA Discussion List members: For your information, below is an
interchange I had this morning with John Fuqua, R/C Aerobatics contest board
chairman regarding potential takeoff/landing rule changes, extracted from
the 2002 NSRCA member survey .
Ron Van Putte
Begin forwarded message:
From: Fuqua John D Contr AAC/YAA <john.fuqua at eglin.af.mil>
Date: November 14, 2003 8:49:15 AM PST
To: "'Ron Van Putte'" <vanputte at cox.net>
Cc: "'Tony Stillman'" <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
Subject: RE: Rule Change Survey Results
OK. This was the result of a personal initiative to submit Discussion
List discussion to me and it is not a official NSRCA input. Duly noted.
I choose not to forward THAT to the board. Again, I will forward an NSRCA
input on the rules proposals should I receive one.
John
-----Original Message-----
From:Ron Van Putte [mailto:vanputte at cox.net]
Sent:Friday, November 14, 2003 10:41 AM
To:Fuqua John D Contr AAC/YAA
Subject:Re: Rule Change Survey Results
On Nov 14, 2003, at 8:26 AM, Fuqua John D Contr AAC/YAA wrote:
Do not know what precipitated this particular input, but I do not want
to get into piecemeal NSRCA inputs to the Board. If NSRCA wants to provide
a comprehensive reccommendation on all proposals, I will forward it to the
Board.
It was the topic of considerable discussion on the NSRCA Discussion
List. It was suggested that the results of the survey be forwarded to the
Board and I agreed to do it.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Fuqua John D Contr AAC/YAA
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:21 AM
To: 'Ron Van Putte'
Cc: 'Tony Stillman'
Subject: RE: Rule Change Survey Results
From 2002. An old survey before the rules proposals were available to
the membership. In my mind I am not sure it is still valid. Do not think
there was a "2004" survey or 2003 for that matter.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Van Putte [mailto:vanputte at cox.net]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:16 AM
To: Fuqua John D Contr AAC/YAA
Cc: discussion at nsrca.org; Tony Stillman
Subject: Rule Change Survey Results
John - I have agreed to forward the results of an NSRCA survey on the
takeoff/landing rule change proposal, which were extracted from a 2002
K-Factor. Here they are:
"This how those who cared to vote in the 2004 NSRCA survey, voted on
landings and Take-off's for 2005 rules proposal changes.
Question-10
Should the Take off and Landing be scored in 401.
YES = 152____ NO = 26_____ RESULT = NO CHANGE____
Question-16
Should take off and landings be scored in Intermediate
YES = 156____ NO = 25_____ RESULT = NO CHANGE____
Question-19
Should takeoff and landings be scored in Advanced
YES = 135____ NO = 39_____ RESULT = NO CHANGE____
Question-24
Should takeoff and landings be scored in Masters
YES = 106____ NO = 60_____ RESULT = NO CHANGE____
As you can see the majority still wanted to have them scored. The vote
weakened a little in Masters but it still was strong for them both to
be scored."
As R/C Aerobatics Contest Board chairman, please distribute the
results
to the other board members prior to the final vote on this proposal.
Ron Van Putte
NSRCA vice president
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20031115/0fb0aef3/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list