Landings and Take-off's - The vote!.:

[george kennie]

That's very fair!

Ron Van Putte wrote:

> On Nov 13, 2003, at 5:46 PM, Keith Black wrote:
>
> > I understand your point regarding NSRCA officials and the regular
> > members
> > being in this together.
> >
> > Given that we now have the full text of all proposals it seems that we
> > could
> > take a poll on all  proposals that were not submitted as a result of
> > NSRCA
> > poll taken last year. The results of this poll could then be given to
> > the
> > rules committee as guidance on the over-all memberships opinion of
> > each rule
> > proposal not included on our initial submission. Things that were
> > defeated
> > on the initial NSRCA poll and not include in our rules proposal would
> > not
> > need to be voted on again, only completely new items that individuals
> > introduced outside of the NSRCA proposals.
> >
> > Of course the rules committee wouldn't be bound to follow our
> > recommendation, but I'm sure it would have some weight as to how they
> > cast
> > their vote. This way we can reduce the chance of a very vocal
> > individual
> > getting his way against the majority of NSRCA members.
> >
> >
>
> I'm not sure about all the individual proposals, but the
> takeoff/landing proposal was covered by the earlier survey and we can
> send the results to the contest board immediately.  I will look into
> the rest.
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#