Board Voting

[Henderson,Eric]

P.S. The maneuvers annex proposal was supported by the survey results but due to its impact and complexity was submitted separately by its sponsors, Tony and Ron.

Regards,

Eric.

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Henderson,Eric
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 7:13 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: RE: Board Voting


If it helps, Any changes with Tom Weedon or Eric Henderson as the submitter are those that came as a direct result of the voting in the NSRCA survey. Tom wrote up the rules and wording changes and I did those for the schedule and maneuver descriptions related to that schedule.

We can post them again on this list if you would like?

Regards,

Eric.



-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of patterndude at attbi.com
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 2:08 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Board Voting


Anyone know where the details of each rule change proposal are?  THe shorthand 
in the MA table leaves out the details.  Besides, it appears that NSRCA and 
IMAC (RC precision and RC precision scale) changes are intermixed.  For 
example, it appears that take off and landings will not longer be scored 
for "someone", but I can't tell whom.
--Lance
> Matt and All:
> I agree with your assessment. I sure hope you're right in this case as
> well
> Bill Glaze.
> 
> Rcmaster199 at aol.com wrote:
> 
> > It's a preliminary vote only by the Board.
> >
> > Past history has shown that if it makes through this stage, it usually
> > passes
> >
> > Matt Kebabjian
> >
> >
> >
> >> ----Original Message-------
> >> From: Bill Glaze <billglaze at triad.rr.com>
> >> Sent: 05/28/03 09:33 AM
> >> To: NSRCA discussion <discussion at nsrca.org>
> >> Subject: Board Voting
> >>
> >> >
> >> > All, (Particularly of interest to Intermediate Competitors:)
> >> I just received my copy of Model Aviation.  I noticed on the voting
> >> results, Contest Board, (page 163) that on RCA-05-17 a favorable
> >> vote
> >> was received.
> >> I take that to mean that the Immelman and snap roll on the 45 deg.
> >> downline have been reinstated.
> >> Am I correct?
> >>
> >> Bill Glaze
> >
> >
> >

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#

============# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#

==================# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#