Mintor warranty question

[patterndude at attbi.com]

I saw the warranty question about the Mintor engines last week and responded 
to Vincent offlist.  But since it was asked again I'll take everyone's advice 
and share this info with everyone.

Mintor S.R.L. is an Italian company that offers a 1 year manufacturer's 
warranty.  They are very proud of their engines.  When I went down my list of 
questions to them their answer on this was, "1 year, but it doesn't matter 
because CNC machines don't make mistakes".  I thought that was funny.

Anyways, to help support the US market AeroSlave (www.aeroslave.com) has been 
authorized by Mintor as a warranty "screener".  What this means is that if you 
bought an engine or part from me and you think it has a manufacturer defect, 
you can send it to Mintor or back to me.  If I can confirm the defect, Mintor 
will ship a replacement to you.  If I can't confirm the defect then it will 
have to go back to Italy.  

This is not the same as US based warranty service, but hopefully it would make 
things a little easier for our customers and save them some overseas shipping 
costs.

I am slowly ordering more and more replacement parts, so your long term 
maintenence issues should be covered.

--Lance
> Eric...there should be a considerable weight savings as well considering
> less fuel needs to be carried as well as less weight per oz due to half
> the nitro and less oil too than the DZ.
> I need to make some decision on a new engine and am primarily concerned
> with everything you said but I'll add one more....warrantee and
> authorized service. Someone asked the warrantee question a couple of
> weeks ago but I never saw an answer.
> I just don't want to go back to 83' when the only parts for Rossi were
> in someone's garage.
> 
> I've been flying a borrowed DZ and man, that puppy does slurp it up!!
> They don't call it a 'Dingo' for nothing!! 
> 
> Best
> 
> Dave
> NSRCA 586
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of Henderson,Eric
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 4:13 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: For Mintor eyes only
> 
> 
>  In case you have had enough of this topic just hit CRTL-D
> 
> If you have not had enough, here is today's lunch results.
> 
> It was warm and muggy today after all of the rain. The Mintor had the
> "target" 17 x 13 APC strapped on the front. With three gallons through
> the engine it was time to really see what the 1.70 was made of! Engine
> was set at 7,900 rpm on the ground using Powermaster 15/16. The Hydeout
> was ready for the ride. 
> 
> Here's how it flew P-03, or at least a description of a few of the
> maneuvers as I saw them unfold.
> 
> Sq. loop on corner - Straight and level into the 45 climb at 1/3
> throttle. Nice even pull. Increase power around the first corner to 3/4.
> Perform 1/2 roll and got on to full power (WOT). Plane continues on at
> slightly increased and smooth speed with the real need to back of the
> gas over the top corner. Long down line 45's and the engine responds
> smoothly on the bottom pullout to level. No gurgle. Upon reflection it
> was a big loop before I noticed.
> 
> Hour glass - very similar with a lot of grunt on the up 45 line.
> 
> All vertical lines were easy with a big punch over the top of maneuvers
> such as Humpty-bumps. The down lines were flown very long to look at
> speed etc. The idle can be set low and it does not quit. This helped the
> down lines and allowed pull-outs that did not bend the wing tubes. The
> idle for spin entry was actually too low and a purr had to be added to
> both reach the middle and get the nose up.
> 
> The big test was the figure-9 with 3 x 1/2 rolls going up. An entry at
> 1/4 throttle as I pushed followed by a incrementing amount of throttle
> as each 1/2 roll was executed ending in full throttle over the top of
> the 9. This was a big 9. Too big for good points but just right for free
> adrenaline shots!
> 
> So how does it (1.70) compare with the OS 1.60. About 200 rpm less on
> the ground but 4.0 oz lighter. Vertical behavior very similar between
> equal weighted planes.
> 
> So how about the DZ. In the same plane it was clear that the DZ had the
> edge in the mid range grunt-dept. Vertical snap rolls were equal however
> in vertical line recovery.
> 
> In the end it comes down to probably five things. Price, Serviceability,
> Reliability, weight and price. Depending upon what you need you can
> chose the performance of a 2-c or a 4-c the personal taste of sound and
> throttle timing.
> 
> I would run all three for equal fun, but as far as price goes, (The OS
> in this case is an FI), the Mintor has a big edge.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Eric.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ============# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> 
> 
> 
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to 
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> 
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#