F3A Biplanes have a future!
Jeff Hughes
jhughes at hsonline.net
Tue May 13 05:42:27 AKDT 2003
Well, there's no reason a biplane can't be made where the both wings
come off and store as one assembly and slip over the tail. A couple of
bolts on the bottom and one for the center strut....
> The only snag that I have found with bi-planes is the assembly at
the field! Four ailerons? wing struts? etc. I sold a very good flying
Ultimate and the 16 screws it took to assemble! I prefer one wing
screw and two aileron leads ....Hmmmmm.... can I adapt???
>
> Regards,
>
> Eric.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Adam Glatt
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 1:15 AM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: F3A Biplanes have a future!
>
>
> That makes three (publically known) biplane projects going on right
now.
> Just when you think you've got the best.... ;> Time to spend more
money.
>
> I'm rather torn on this biplane issue. Should FAI add a new rule
that
> outlaws them? On one hand, I'm sure they will improve our flights,
but on
> the other I don't want them to be advantage over the planes we have
now.
> Kind of like changing the 2m size limit to 2.5m. The guys with the
big
> factories behind them will have an advantage, while the rest of us
will be
> alienated. Going to biplanes might be no different than going to
2.5m, only
> it isn't against the rules. Or, it might be like the switch to 2m
planes
> from the .60 planes. I would hate to go back to a 0.60 after flying
a 2m.
>
> That said, I want a biplane. I do expect they will fly better,
which is
> certainly a good thing, and someone has to develop them before I get
to fly
> it.
>
> Still divided, but practicing as much as possible anyways,
> Adam Glatt
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "PENNISI Peter" <Peter.Pennisi at publicworks.qld.gov.au>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: May 12, 2003 8:17 PM
> Subject: F3A Biplanes have a future!
>
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I had to opportunity to watch a F3A biplane fly for a short while
in the
> > hands of a very capable pilot last weekend. The model was built by
a local
> > kit manufacturer who adapted a set of wings to Carrera 2000
(Designed by
> > Peter Goldsmith)as an experiment.
> >
> > The model was flown briefly through the P03 schedule until an
unfortunate
> > problem resulted in the model having to land minus wings on one
side of
> the
> > fuse (More on that later) Anyway the flight looked very impressive
> > especially in the broader speed envelope the model was capable of
flying
> in.
> > The model was powered with a YS140DZ and weighed about 10.5pounds.
> >
> > The very experienced F3A pilot commented how impressed he was with
the
> model
> > and felt it was already better than his current monoplane.
Particular
> > comments he made was that it spins, stall turns and rolls great
snaps
> would
> > have been great until half the wing was ripped off as a result of
> > overstressing.
> >
> > What this pilot did as the wings tore off was truly impressive.
With the
> > wings completely ripped off from one side of the fuse he had the
> initiative
> > to throttle up and fly the model in knife-edge and fly it around
to make a
> > crash landing approach. The end result was a few scratches to the
fuse and
> a
> > broken prop. This was one of the most impressive things I have
seen.
> >
> > It is a pity I didn't have my video camera with me as it certainly
would
> > have been great to see over and over again.
> >
> > I was very sceptical about F3A biplanes in Pattern until I saw
this model
> > fly on the weekend. I have no doubt that will be taken seriously
at the
> next
> > world champs.
> >
> > Follow this link to view the model prior to it crashing.
> >
> > http://www.qpfa.org.au/neil/a_couple_of_stories_from_behind_.html
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Peter
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>
>
--
CoreComm Webmail.
http://home.core.com
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list