4 pt roll

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

In a message dated 5/4/2003 12:22:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time, jed241 at msn.com 
writes:


> Subj:Re: 4 pt roll 
> Date:5/4/2003 12:22:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:jed241 at msn.com">jed241 at msn.com</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> New at the judging game…
>  
> ********To re-phrase what I think I read.  As a judge; if the roll rate is 
> so 
> fast that I am not sure that all points existed as hestiations, then I 
> can issue a downgrade for a missed point or points.  A missed point 
> would be a major downgrade.***********
>  
> If even one point is missed (no hesitation), would this warrant a zero vs 
> major downgrade as it is not a 4 point roll? Is this view too critical for 
> the four point roll?
> 
> Curious…
>  
> Larry
> 
> 

Larry,

A missed point is not a zero in the four point roll. It's a major downgrade. 
The amount of deduction is in the book

Matt K
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030504/588422db/attachment.html