Tail First?
ronlock
ronlock at comcast.net
Sat Mar 1 04:48:48 AKST 2003
Ive seen full scale birds do a number of things that we
don't want to emulate. <G>
Ron Lockhart
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry Terrenoire" <amad2terry at juno.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: FOCUS gear Mod.
> I do not remember it's inception, and I disagree with it. While watching
> a film of some full scale areobatics lately, I saw a full size ship land
> with the tail wheel hitting the ground first! That makes the tail-first
> landing "scale"!
>
> Terry T.
>
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:54:40 -0500 "Henderson,Eric"
> <Eric.Henderson at gartner.com> writes:
> > Gene,
> > "Dragging the tail" is an expression meant to indicate that
> > the nose is being held higher than usual. The idea being to create
> > high planform-drag and a desired slowing-down effect. To do a three
> > point landing or just have the mains touch first, you need to fly
> > the plane in slowly that way. I am sure I did not say "drag your
> > tail along the runway".
> >
> > BTW - I never really understood the purpose of "that" rule. What was
> > it preventing??? Anyone old enough to recall its inception?
> >
> >
> > Eric.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gene.maurice at attbi.com [mailto:gene.maurice at attbi.com]
> > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:44 PM
> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > Subject: Re: FOCUS gear Mod.
> >
> >
> > Eric,
> >
> > I was under the impression that "dragging the tail in" is a no-no.
> >
> > Per the rule book:
> > "Landing. The landing maneuver will start two (2)meters from the
> > ground. The
> > model flares smoothly to a nose-high attitude, dissipating flying
> > speed, then
> > smoothly touching the ground, within the landing zone, with the main
> > wheels
> > first, with no bouncing or changes in heading after touch down. The
> > nose wheel
> > on a tricycle gear and the tail wheel on a conventional gear (unless
> > a three
> > (3) point landing of mains and tail wheel touching simultaneously is
> > executed)
> > should settle gently to the ground after a brief rollout."
> >
> > Am I mistaken?
> > --
> > Gene Maurice
> > gene.maurice at attbi.com
> > NSRCA 877
> > AMA 3408
> > > I would suggest using a swept landing gear al la Hydeout or
> > Temptation. I tried
> > > a set of retract wings on a Focus and noted a couple of inches
> > difference in the
> > > wheel positions. Also initial landings tended to bounce if you
> > came in too hot.
> > > The wheels work in the current position and you soon learn to land
> > it that way
> > > by dragging the tail in! . However the plane will bounce less if
> > you can sweep
> > > the gear back.
> > >
> > > The problem, that you already identified, is that you have to
> > widen the gear
> > > plate to accommodate the wider U/C legs that are available in CF.
> > They put the
> > > gear plate as far back as they could - it almost touched the wing
> > - but the
> > > plate is tricky to widen.
> > >
> > > My recommendation is to replace the existing plate with a plywood
> > box to stop
> > > the bolted part flexing. You could leave the trailing 1/4" rail in
> > place. Cut
> > > through forward to accommodate the wider U/C-leg-top. Fit a 3/16"
> > "box plate and
> > > glue to the former as well. It is more work, but it is winter
> > and you will not > regret a stronger landing gear support on this
> > plane, plus it will be easier to
> > > score higher on landings..
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Eric.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Crozier [mailto:sjcrozier at comcast.net]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:43 AM
> > > To: nsrca discussion
> > > Subject: focus gear
> > >
> > >
> > > Anybody using Bolly gear on the Focus?
> > > I don't want to do major mods on the landing gear platform.
> > > The Sukhoi style has been suggested, but I can't find it on the
> > Bolly web
> > > site.
> > > Is the swept back design of the F3A large too drastic?
> > > thanx...croz
> > >
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> > >
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> > >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> > ====================================# To be removed from this list,
> > send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> >
> >
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list