Masters Cuban 8 w/ 2/4
george kennie
geobet at gis.net
Wed Jun 18 17:55:23 AKDT 2003
That's interesting Matt,
I never heard of a Running Eight! It must be like the Ukie horizontal
eight???
G.
Rcmaster199 at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 6/18/2003 1:31:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> James.Woodward2 at edwards.af.mil writes:
>
>
>
>> Subj:Masters Cuban 8 w/ 2/4
>> Date:6/18/2003 1:31:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>> From:James.Woodward2 at edwards.af.mil
>> Reply-to:discussion at nsrca.org
>> To:discussion at nsrca.org
>> Sent from the Internet
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> I've been practicing this maneuver and I'm having trouble getting
>> making it repeatable/consistent/, etc. So, I took a music CD and
>> drew two circles that have the same baseline and touch each other at
>> their closest points. If you do this, you will quickly see that two
>> adjacent circles have no place for 45 degree lines to be drawn in
>> between them. It appears to me from the drawing that actually you
>> cannot maintain a constant radius AND perform a 45 degree "LINE"
>> within this maneuver. If you maintained a constant radius you would
>> never reach a point where you could depart that curve onto a 45
>> degree up or downline, and intersect the magic spot on the other
>> loop at the same radius.
>>
>>
>>
>> Am I out to lunch on this, or do you indeed need different radii:
>> 1.) blending 45 degree line into loop 2.) looping segment. Or, the
>> loops are not really supposed to touch each other in the middle,
>> thus there is some distance between each loop?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jim W.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Jimbo,
>
> The loops should not touch. Do the maneuver as it is described in the
> book: 5/8ths to a 45 deg down line, etc, etc.
>
> What you actually sketched is the figure for the Running Eight. That
> is not the same as a Cuban Eight
>
> regards
>
> Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030618/dbb50f93/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list