Team Trials Ignored by AMA

[Dean Pappas]

Gray,
Hold on, AMA really do need to aim for the middle of the target. Don't blame the organization.
I'm just saddened that MA is no longer devoting a portion of its pages to the healthy cross-pollenation between different areas and intensity levels in the hobby, as a policy.
Eric's points should be well taken (and I know this 'cause I wrote for Bob for many years): the regular columns are for this sort of thing.
That's why my ears picked up when I read Tony's comment.
I'm just dismayed that the Sunday flier thinks that the "Indianapolis Effect" doesn't work to his advantage.
The typical AMA member (not some behind the scenes big-brother) is demanding that MA stop printing the stuff. Funny, they could just flip the page!
That's  why the Bradbury reference.
 
Regards and remember, as Eric said, we can make it better!
    Dean

-----Original Message-----
From: BUDDYonRC at aol.com [mailto:BUDDYonRC at aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:48 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Team Trials Ignored by AMA


Gray
Very good!
My take on the situation is that AMA has become a business that is driven by the hobby industry and is more interested in new members and growing it's membership than in taking care of the things and people groups that brought it to where it is today.
Seems to me that good leadership should be able to provide both.
Buddy 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030617/93db44d5/attachment.html