Wrong Maneuver issues

[Ed Deaver]

I hate the calling out the manuevers for the judges to hear as a caller.  If 
you consider the pilot and caller as a team, trying to call things out for 
the judges in an appropriate time frame, probably is NOT what you would do 
just simply calling for the pilot.  Bits of advice, complements for good 
manuevers, masks for the manuevers you're trying to get the pilot to forget 
etc, as well as advice.

Ed


>From: WHIP23 at aol.com
>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>To: discussion at nsrca.org
>Subject: Re: Wrong Maneuver issues
>Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:29:10 EDT
>
>In a message dated 6/11/03 8:12:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>Patternrules at aol.com writes:
>
> >
> > Personally I like it when the caller calls the maneuvers loud enough for 
>the
> > judges to hear, then I don't need a scribe just a blank paper, then
> > transcribe the # after the flight.
> >
> > Steve Maxwell
>
>I agree, with the caller calling the maneuvers loud enough for the judges 
>to
>hear, but I have found that there is a lot of resistance to this 
>proceedure.
>I've always viewed presenting the sequence such that the judges could judge
>it, easily and correctly as part of the "job" and the caller can contribute 
>to
>that to a large degree, by calling the maneuvers such that there is no
>confusion.  I will also point out that I have nearly been lynched for this 
>position,
>on occasion :-)
>
>This otta' get some action going on the list (flame suit on, bring it)
>
>Bob

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#