Wrong Maneuver issues

jed241 at msn.com jed241 at msn.com
Tue Jun 10 14:30:19 AKDT 2003


Mark,

Do you think if I did a 1/2 Reverse Cuban 8 after the straight flight back instead of the correct 1/2 Cuban 8 again, the judges might have missed it...Oh, I remember...They marked it zero when I said "oh shoot"...<VBG> I was pretty proud of that scribbled out 8 though...ha...

Larry
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Atwood, Mark 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:01 PM
  Subject: RE: Wrong Maneuver issues


  I'll go back to my previous statement...I'm a huge advocate of "benefit of the doubt"...which means if I know the manuever they're trying to fly, then it's "recognized" and I would award the downgrade, not a zero.  Lord knows we'd be handing out zeros continuously in sportsman otherwise.  

  I only use the "unrecognizable manuever" zero when it's so bad that the manuever would be a zero if I did recognize it....


  Take the double Weedon for example :) VBG...sorry Tom...couldn't help myself.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Henderson,Eric [mailto:Eric.Henderson at gartner.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:51 AM
    To: discussion at nsrca.org
    Subject: Wrong Maneuver issues


    The example below is clearly the wrong maneuver, but what about a top-hat where the pilot does not draw a straight line on the top. It looks just like a Humpty so do you zero for unrecognizable maneuver, or down-grade 2-4 points???

    E.


    -----Original Message-----
    From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of WHIP23 at aol.com
    Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:28 AM
    To: discussion at nsrca.org
    Subject: Re: Scoring Vs Judging


    In a message dated 6/10/03 8:20:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, gfowler at raytheon.com writes:



      Yeah but if you 1/2 rolled on the way up, pushed over the top, then no roll would be required on the down leg....




    I agree the issue is that the 1/2 roll must be on the up line, the zero was for a 1/2 roll on the way down, not a legal variation per the rule book.

    Bob 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030610/57d7ac1c/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list