Wrong Maneuver issues

[Atwood, Mark]

I'll go back to my previous statement...I'm a huge advocate of "benefit of the doubt"...which means if I know the manuever they're trying to fly, then it's "recognized" and I would award the downgrade, not a zero.  Lord knows we'd be handing out zeros continuously in sportsman otherwise.  
 
I only use the "unrecognizable manuever" zero when it's so bad that the manuever would be a zero if I did recognize it....
 
 
Take the double Weedon for example :) VBG...sorry Tom...couldn't help myself.

-----Original Message-----
From: Henderson,Eric [mailto:Eric.Henderson at gartner.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:51 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Wrong Maneuver issues


The example below is clearly the wrong maneuver, but what about a top-hat where the pilot does not draw a straight line on the top. It looks just like a Humpty so do you zero for unrecognizable maneuver, or down-grade 2-4 points???
 
E.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of WHIP23 at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:28 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Scoring Vs Judging


In a message dated 6/10/03 8:20:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, gfowler at raytheon.com writes:




Yeah but if you 1/2 rolled on the way up, pushed over the top, then no roll would be required on the down leg....





I agree the issue is that the 1/2 roll must be on the up line, the zero was for a 1/2 roll on the way down, not a legal variation per the rule book.

Bob 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030610/0c012faa/attachment.html