FAI F3AL---Pattern IMAC combined

[Troy Newman]

"I've yet to see an IMAC'er have a good landing."
--GeorgeF

Well again I can say that its the attitudes and policies that drive our
organization.

I guess pattern flyers are just better pilots....must be a requirement to
fly pattern...better skills, better equipment, overall just better....

Are pattern pilots better than the Pylon guys too? What about the Sailplane
guys? and Pattern guys must be better pilots than the chopper guys because
they can't even build a flying machine that the wings don't move!

Attitudes can win or loose the hearts and minds.

Things that make you go HMMMMMMMM


TN

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "GeorgeF." <av8tor at flash.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: FAI F3AL---Pattern IMAC combined


> At 12:33 PM 7/30/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >Good point Tony. Another problem is noise. Pattern engines are much more
> >quiet, and much of what a pattern pilot depends on is throttle up and
down,
> >( the noise one hears ). With a big noisy gas engine roaring in the sky,
a
> >pattern guy would probably have a tuff time .
>
>
> Another point is safety.   I don't know you but everytime I've been at a
> field and an IMAC style plane comes out to the line I land.  I've yet to
> see an IMAC'er have a good landing.  Twice now I've nearly been hit by one
> while landing....  Sorry you will not see me flying when an IMAC'er is in
> the air....
>
> George
> http://www.AuctionWholesaler.com
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#