FAI F3AL---Pattern IMAC combined

[Woodward James R Civ 412 TW/DRP/ACQ]

I think that if a "run-what-you-brung" rule is imposed and IMAC and Pattern
are ran in the same contest sometimes, I would still enter.  However, the
IMAC guys don't use a box (or is it 180 degrees, 100' away?).  The idea of
competing with my pattern plane against a 40% plane doesn't bother me
because I'm confident with it.  However, I think the IMAC guys would be
hugely against that because it is not "scale'ish" in design.  

An open aerobatic competition, schedules with whatever plane you want to
fly, is appealing to me.
0.01 cent worth.  
Jim W.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Uhler [mailto:juhler at bellsouth.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:27 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: re: FAI F3AL---Pattern IMAC combined

Troy (look, I got your name right!),

This by far is the best approach that I have seen, to date in this list.  I
am very interested in hearing your ideas on combining IMAC and Pattern.  I
don't understand the need for people to bash one area of a hobby just cause
they don't participate in it.  I am not a fisherman, but do bass fisherman
bash fly fisherman?  Using the RC example I guess they do.....

I would be willing to help, in any way, in promoting the joint effort.

Thanks,

Jon  

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#