fixed gear vs. retracts
Rodney Tanner
rodney19821982 at yahoo.com
Thu Jul 17 12:52:47 AKDT 2003
Like many others I have switched to fixed gear. For
all the reasons mentioned: sure gear up looks great in
the air but - bottom line: they were a pain to keep
adjusting. But a few years back, during my misguided
stint with IMAC planes, I had the constant problem of
fixed gears ripping out. On one Midwest Giles I must
have ripped them out over 20 times!
Well the main problem was´nt really the set ups, or
the mountings. The real problem was my lousy landing
technique, or the severe lack there of!
So last year I bought a small trainer - a GP Venus
ARF, with an OS FX61 and just practiced landings,
hundreds of them. Now when I feel that my landings
need a bit work, I pull out the Venus and do a hundred
or so.
Rodney Tanner
NSRCA 2906
The result is no fixed gears seem get ripped out on my
regular Pattern planes. (Touch wood!!)
--- Wayne Galligan <wgalligan at goodsonacura.com> wrote:
> Nats airplane only wieghts about 8lbs and is powered
> by a .91 size engine. The l.g. struts come out of
> the wing much like a torsion bar type l.g. I am not
> sure how it is mounted in the wing though. It is
> however a rather novel idea. His stuff is on the
> edge in design and asthetics but it really flies
> good. The "Vodoo Magic" flown by Todd Blose would
> do everything in the book you could throw at it.
>
> Wayne G.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: calvin scully
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:53 PM
> Subject: Re: fixed gear vs. retracts
>
>
> Would like to see detail of how Nat Penton uses CF
> rods to accomodate a 10 to 11 lb model airplane.
> Like Mr. Ferrell I am interested.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Ferrell
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:56 AM
> Subject: Re: fixed gear vs. retracts
>
>
> Keep the articles coming!
> If you have a pointer to a picture of the Carbon
> tubing gear I am sure I am not the only one
> interested.
>
> I am in total agreement that it is better to
> make our planes serviceable rather than
> indestructible!
>
> John Ferrell
> 6241 Phillippi Rd
> Julian NC 27283
> Phone: (336)685-9606
> johnferrell at earthlink.net
> Dixie Competition Products
> NSRCA 479 AMA 4190 W8CCW
> "My Competition is Not My Enemy"
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:39 PM
> Subject: Re: fixed gear vs. retracts
>
>
> The composite fixed gear designs of today are
> quite the overkill in terms of strength, rigidity
> and weight. They could be made far lighter, less
> rigid and cheaply enough where, as they break on a
> hard landing, simply pull the pieces out and toss
> them.
>
> My good friend Nat Penton is using regular
> carbon tubing material for the struts, and uses a
> short piece of aluminum rod epoxied in the tube, to
> serve as wheel axle. A quick wrapping of kevlar
> thread, super glued on the carbon tube where the
> axle in epoxied, keeps the tube intact.
>
> He is reporting that the struts weigh in at
> less than 1 oz for both, with the farings installed
> to a fully airfoiled section, without the wheels.
> The length is 10 inches.
>
> Matt
>
> PS- I prefer retracts to fixed gear for
> pattern planes except they are too heavyat around 6
> ozs sans wheels.
>
> My composite gear that I make, come in at
> about 4 ozs with pants, for the pair, sans wheels,
> but will be using Nat's technique to reduce the
> weight further with little compromise in strength.
> I'll probably write about it for the KF. If you have
> been following my writings you should have learned
> that I have been keeping no secrets.
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list