MK retrofit question
Del K. Rykert
drykert at rochester.rr.com
Fri Dec 26 07:20:08 AKST 2003
That is exactly what I would do also Anthony. Accurate and practical retrofit.
del
NSRCA - 473
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Wantz
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: MK retrofit question
On my Odyssey II I use pull-pull on the elevator. This has to be the lightest installation yet and is very easy and secure. As far as disturbing the finish, all you need is a total of four small holes, correctly placed, from which the cables exit the fuselage. This location can incorporate guides of small tubing if desired-I've used it both ways. I use this method on all my planes. Light, easy to do, and accurate.
----- Original Message -----
From: Anthony Abdullah
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 10:17 AM
Subject: MK retrofit question
Hello all, I recently acquired a very nice pattern plane that is set up for dual elevator servos in the stabs. That is not my favorite set up as I hate spending the time trying to get the throws exactly the same. Furthermore I noticed about 6 ounces of lead in the nose which I definitely hate and would like to eliminate. As such I want to convert it to a single servo up front and either a carbon fiber pushrod with Y rods, or the MK dual elevator system which I have had very good luck with. I would even entertain the possibility of a pull pull elevator if it is lighter and less of a pain to install.
My question:
Are there any tricks that I could use to make the retrofit less of a surgical nightmare? I would like to install it with a minimum disturbance to the finish so I don't have to do a lot of refinishing and color matching.
The plane:
Odyssey, narrow fiberglass fuselage relative to the widebodies that are currently in vogue, OS 140 RX.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
TIA
Anthony
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20031226/03dd6d78/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list