Advanced sequence Spin

george kennie geobet at gis.net
Thu Apr 24 09:59:22 AKDT 2003




I've almost chewed through my lip!






"Henderson,Eric" wrote:

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henderson,Eric
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 10:14 AM
> To: Henderson,Eric; 'discussion at nsrca.org'
> Subject: RE: Advanced sequence Spin
>
> I meant to make the point that this stuff is hard to find if you are
> not an NSRCA member. If you are an AMA member only you tend to go by
> what it says in the rule book. this can lead to some interesting
> moments at an AMA sanctioned contest.Eric.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henderson,Eric
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 10:07 AM
> To: 'discussion at nsrca.org'
> Subject: RE: Advanced sequence Spin
>
> The big debate last year was about line length after the 1/4 loop.The
> rule book is not clear. It does not say 1/2 the length of the
> down-line. If that is the case it would also have to define what is a
> down-line in a spin. Would it be the total down-line including the
> spin?orThe length of the straight, up-spun, line...The Judging
> committee's role is to clarify this type of confusion, but, and it is
> a big but, it does not have the power to make rule changes. Where we
> can't sort it out they go to the AMA contest board for clarification
> or for a ruling. The ultimate goal being to eventually get an update
> in the rule book. the problem is that in the interim we do not have a
> easy place to find these "temporary" rulings or
> interpretations.Regards,Eric.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030424/2a26d918/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list