DZ flying time

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Eric, et al,

Another big problem with the big gassies is WHO FLIES THEM LOCALLY. In my 
club, it's sport fliers. Excepting for two good ones, the rest scare hell out 
of me.
 Very dangerous. When they fly, I sit. Except, of course, when they take off 
after I do, which gets to your whole noise issue and lack of hearing my 
pattern planes.

Unfortunately, most of the sport or club fliers, go for the noise. It's 
NASCAR to too many of them with a big WOW factor and an adrenaline rush. The 
noisier the better

Folks, I think we may have been duped on this noise thing. I love my stealthy 
pattern plane, but nobody else does. unless I'm flying alone,  nobody else 
cares whetehr I hear my plane or not!!

Ed, on your DIZZY flying time, I suggest you go with a Webra 145 and 16 oz 
tank. The most frugal set-up out there, in this size.

Matt Kebabjian


> Subj:RE: DZ flying time 
> Date:4/18/2003 12:14:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:Eric.Henderson at gartner.com">Eric.Henderson at gartner.com</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> Easter fun with Oddino...Hmmmmm
> 
> The problem with those DA 150's is that they draw shotgun fire and you 
> usually only get to fly them once per field. 
> 
> It's ironic that the noise issue for pattern planes of old is now the same 
> issue for Scale Aerobatics.... The irony being that precision aerobatic 
> planes are now soooo! quiet that we are welcomed and enjoyed. Of course we 
> can't hear our engines so we get very good at dead stick landings....
> 
> On a more challenging note, the pattern spec's are there to be met and 
> there for a reason. They are a competition challenge in their own right. It 
> is the basis of the sport to produce designs and technology to met those 
> specs. Without them i.e. if they were relaxed, we would not have developed 
> the CF pipes, FG technology, light weight foam wings etc. There would go 
> the fun for many of us. Take away the size and weight limits and all you 
> get is an average plane...
> 
> 30-15, your service....
> 
> 
> EVL-1
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Tomanek, Wojtek
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 11:53 AM
> To: 'discussion at nsrca.org'
> Subject: RE: DZ flying time
> 
> 
> 35.5 lb of thrust 
> 6.2 HP (although it is only rated at max output of 5 HP) <LOL>
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:     JOddino [mailto:JOddino at socal.rr.com] 
> Sent:    Friday, April 18, 2003 12:11 AM
> To:    discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject:    Re: DZ flying time
> 
> I believe I can fly for 30 minutes on my 24 oz. tank although I've never
> stayed up that long.  That is with a 22x10 prop that turns about 7200 at
> WOT.  Put those numbers in your static thrust calculator.  Pattern needs to
> liberalize the rules so you can use engines like my DA 50.
> Just trying to stir up a little controversy.
> Jim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ed Deaver" <divesplat1 at msn.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 8:48 PM
> Subject: DZ flying time
> 
> 
> > Am looking for some ideas on fuel conservatism for the DZ.
> >
> > In the Oly Medal, 24oz Dubro tank with YS foam clunk, needle at 1.25
> turns,
> > Prop APC 16.5X12W running 8400RPM(using ATV to turn down from 9100rpm).
> >
> > I get through the masters sequence, using more throttle management than
> > ever, for me, with one extra pass at times before the first burble, this
> is
> > prior to 7.5 minutes.
> >
> > Any thoughts on getting more flying time?  I am about ready to go to a
> > hopper tank but want to exhaust my options before this.
> >
> > Thanx in advance.
> >
> > ed

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030418/fa8c615a/attachment.html