Hirobo Stream-50

Bill Glaze billglaze at triad.rr.com
Thu Apr 17 13:46:51 AKDT 2003


John:
Tried to get a search on Swallow; only got one serious reply, that was about a
power plant.  There were, however, a couple of remarks about Monica Lewinsky.
I must have been searching incorrectly.
Thanks.

Bill Glaze

John Crozier wrote:

> Bill..Many posts on RCUniverse.com..
> Search "Swallow"....croz
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Glaze" <billglaze at triad.rr.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 2:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Hirobo Stream-50
>
> > Eric:
> > I recently picked up a Swallow kit from Ron van Putte.  I like the
> simplicity of fixed gear, but would go to retracts if the handling of the
> airplane would be better.
> > Horsepower shouldn't be an issue, as I intend to power the craft with a
> Y.S. 1.20 (old style.)  Unless I get a lot of advice that says "don't use
> that engine."
> > Comments, anybody with knowledge of the airframe?
> >
> > Bill Glaze
> >
> >
> > "Henderson,Eric" wrote:
> >
> > > No web-site.
> > >
> > > They are two different creatures. If you want an almost-2M type pattern
> plane size an behavior, the Swallow will fit the bill. If you are a sport
> flyer that wants to try pattern with a similar 40-60 sized plane economy of
> scale effect, you will be delighted with how well the Stream-50 conducts
> itself in the air.
> > >
> > > The Swallow is fixed or retracts. The Stream-50 is retracts. They both
> "behave" well. The do behave like the above mentioned counterparts.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Eric.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of JZeigenfus at aol.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 2:53 PM
> > > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > > Subject: Re: Hirobo Stream-50
> > >
> > > Do you have a web site for the Hirobo Stream -50? Does it behave better
> or the same as the Swallow? JEZ
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> > >
> > > ====================================# To be removed from this list, send
> a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> >
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list