Hirobo Stream-50

Bill Glaze billglaze at triad.rr.com
Thu Apr 17 12:44:44 AKDT 2003


Eric:
I recently picked up a Swallow kit from Ron van Putte.  I like the simplicity of fixed gear, but would go to retracts if the handling of the airplane would be better.
Horsepower shouldn't be an issue, as I intend to power the craft with a Y.S. 1.20 (old style.)  Unless I get a lot of advice that says "don't use that engine."
Comments, anybody with knowledge of the airframe?

Bill Glaze


"Henderson,Eric" wrote:

> No web-site.
>
> They are two different creatures. If you want an almost-2M type pattern plane size an behavior, the Swallow will fit the bill. If you are a sport flyer that wants to try pattern with a similar 40-60 sized plane economy of scale effect, you will be delighted with how well the Stream-50 conducts itself in the air.
>
> The Swallow is fixed or retracts. The Stream-50 is retracts. They both "behave" well. The do behave like the above mentioned counterparts.
>
> Regards,
>
> Eric.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of JZeigenfus at aol.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 2:53 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Hirobo Stream-50
>
> Do you have a web site for the Hirobo Stream -50? Does it behave better or the same as the Swallow? JEZ
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
> ====================================# To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list