Rudder Turbulator Strips

[Tomanek, Wojtek]

Assuming that all pushrods are stiff enough and servos strong enough it
should snap at higher speeds, although the wing tube may not like that <G>

 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	John Ferrell [mailto:johnferrell at earthlink.net] 
Sent:	Thursday, April 17, 2003 9:17 AM
To:	discussion at nsrca.org
Subject:	Re: Rudder Turbulator Strips

Thinking in public:
As the rudder TE becomes wider the dominate difference is likely drag.
Since drag is a function of velocity there would be little diference in
flight at low velocity.
However you might reach a point where a pattern ship would refuse to snap at
high velocity...
Just speculation.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean Pappas" <d.pappas at kodeos.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 4:49 PM
Subject: RE: Rudder Turbulator Strips


John, we are on the same page:
Blunt trailing edges make for torsionally stiffer (read that lighter)
ailerons and the like. They also soften the neutrals (and the textbooks say
so).
They also reduce the ultimate CL of an airfoil, unless it is designed to
work with one.
Selig worked up one such for the SAE weight-lifting students who wanted to
stick with non-composite wings. It gives up "almost nothing" to the razor
sharp TEs.
Somehow the hundredth of a mile per hour that is robbed matters to some
people.
Let's face it, the sharp TEs look sexy, and that probably where the rubber
meets the road.

as confused as you are,
Dean



=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#