Rudder Turbulator Strips
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Tue Apr 15 15:23:48 AKDT 2003
In a message dated 4/15/2003 4:50:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
d.pappas at kodeos.com writes:
> Subj:RE: Rudder Turbulator Strips
> Date:4/15/2003 4:50:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:d.pappas at kodeos.com">d.pappas at kodeos.com</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet
>
>
>
> John, we are on the same page:
> Blunt trailing edges make for torsionally stiffer (read that lighter)
> ailerons and the like. They also soften the neutrals (and the textbooks say
> so).
> They also reduce the ultimate CL of an airfoil, unless it is designed to
> work with one.
> Selig worked up one such for the SAE weight-lifting students who wanted to
> stick with non-composite wings. It gives up "almost nothing" to the razor
> sharp TEs.
> Somehow the hundredth of a mile per hour that is robbed matters to some
> people.
> Let's face it, the sharp TEs look sexy, and that probably where the rubber
> meets the road.
>
> as confused as you are,
> Dean
>
Dean,
This vein reminds of the conversation several years ago on this list,
regarding flutter induction of ailerons. It has been suggested by many in the
past, including the Dean of Pattern himself, (Don Lowe, for the uninitiated),
that thicker TEs reduced the onset of flutter.
However, I don't recall anyone really having an answer to whether it's a
mechanical issue (thicker TE=stiffer surface) or aerodynamic issue (thinner
TE at very low Reynolds Numbers=turbulation and flutter). I suspect both are
part answers to the equation, and since we fly at pretty low speeds, making
the TE's fatter is not a bad thing
One thing is certain: supersonic craft have very thin TE's so at high speed
thin TE's=less drag
Matt Kebabjian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030415/d27c0a70/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list