3M 1.40

mdarr00 at comcast.net mdarr00 at comcast.net
Thu Apr 10 15:46:41 AKDT 2003


    Eric, try http://www.buyrc.com/

Mike Darr


----- Original Message -----
From: "Henderson,Eric" <Eric.Henderson at gartner.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 7:20 PM
Subject: RE: 3M 1.40


I'd like to know more about the 1.70. Can someone repeat who the importer is
please..

Eric.

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of mdarr00 at comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 7:15 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: 3M 1.40


    I disassembled my 3M 170, and found metal shavings in the grease for the
rear bearing.  There were other small metal shavings in various places in
the engine.  I completely cleaned every part and reassembled it.

    The connecting rod does not use bearings, it uses bushings just like all
other connecting rods.  I have not ran my engine as of yet, but it is
definitely a beautiful work of art, the tolerances in the engine are nice
and tight, a very good sign of high quality.  The rear bearing on the 170
has the same i.d. and o.d. of the 140, except that it has a double row of
rollers.  Boca Bearing measured the bearing on my 170 at the Toledo show,
and they told me they should have the bearings available in a couple of
weeks.

Mike Darr


----- Original Message -----
From: "Woodward James R Civ 412 TW/DRP (Test Ops)"
<James.Woodward2 at edwards.af.mil>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 3:11 PM
Subject: RE: 3M 1.40


> Before running my 170, I did take off the head and backplate and look
> inside.  They use ball-bearings on the connecting rod If I remember
> correctly.  Then, I put it back together and checked all the other bolts
for
> tightness and ran it.
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AAbdu at aol.com [mailto:AAbdu at aol.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 12:08 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: 3M 1.40
>
> I wouldn't necessarily suggest taking it apart, unless you just like doing
> that sort of thing. Just give it a very thourough visual inspection and
keep
> an eye out for anything that seems to be a little "weird". At the very
most
> I might take off the head or the back plate (probably not with the pump
back
> there)and give it a look. Mike Darr is the owner of the engine I looked at
> and he is on the list so he would probably be able to tell you much better
> that I could what to look for. Overall I was very impressed with it. It is
> possible but unlikely that 3M would go through the trouble of
manufacturing
> such an obviously high quality premium engine, then shoot themselves in
the
> foot by not paying attention to an important detail like clearing all
milled
> material before final assembly.
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#

============# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list