K-Factor vision of the future.
Martin X. Moleski, SJ
moleski at canisius.edu
Sat Sep 28 05:51:56 AKDT 2002
--On Saturday, September 28, 2002 5:33 AM -0700 Wade & Barbara Akle <wb_akle at msn.com> wrote:
> One question is how come I get to download in pdf format all kind of manuals
> and pages of information larger than the k-factor in a reasonable time and
> yet have avoided the k-factor because of the time it takes??
I speculate (but do not know) that there may be a bottleneck
at the server end as well as at your end. Faster servers may
help make the download time less oppressive.
> Until the download time on a 56 kbps phone line gets down to less than
> a minute or two, we have a losing proposition, leaving a lot of us
> without the k-factor.
If there were a text-only version offered, that might be
possible. But there is a limit to how much stuff you can
get through a 56 kbps pipeline, even if the server were
the fastest imaginable. I don't forsee compression technology
making huge leaps any time soon. They've got stuff packed
pretty tightly as it is now.
Another possibility for the mix: a CD-ROM subscription.
I have no idea of what the cost might be for that compared
to a hard-copy subscription. Just another brainstorm
to add to the list of suggestions.
Marty #2874
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list