The MASTERS 2005 PROPOSED ROUTINE THAT YOU VOTED FOR.

[Del Rykert]

When I look at what the K-Factor used to be (1 folded 8 x 11 page) and what
we have now when we get it, makes me smile. The lack of being timely does
bother me immensely. I thought dividing up the chores of producing it was
going to solve that problem. Going electronic does have some financial
advantages but I go long periods of time without having access to a
computer. I can grab my mail on the way out the door and still get to read
and digest at work. Going electronic is not better for me. I may be in the
minority on this part. It gets discouraging when I have 150 to 200 messages
waiting for me next time I sign on. If adding electronic K factor adds to
that load then something will give. I fear it will be my reading the
k-factor or only glimpsing as my district. I'm the big loser of course but
please remember many of us do have puters but we don't have them at work and
or life's hectic schedule doesn't allow timely access to blurbs and notices.
Can I justify paying double of price to read the throne variety. I'm not
certain.

     Del K. Rykert
     AMA - 8928
     NSRCA - 473
     Kb2joi - General
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henderson,Eric" <eric.henderson at gartner.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:23 AM
Subject: RE: The MASTERS 2005 PROPOSED ROUTINE THAT YOU VOTED FOR.


Any K Factor rating experts out there, please wade in..

Eric.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tomanek, Wojtek [mailto:tomanekw at saic-abingdon.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:21 PM
To: 'discussion at nsrca.org'
Subject: RE: The MASTERS 2005 PROPOSED ROUTINE THAT YOU VOTED FOR.


Should the maneuver # 9  (9. Half Inside Loop, 2/4 on exit K=1) be rated
K=2, comparing to an Immelman which is K=2?

WKT

-----Original Message-----
From: Henderson,Eric [SMTP:eric.henderson at gartner.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:27 PM
To: Discussion at Nsrca. Org
Subject: The MASTERS 2005 PROPOSED ROUTINE THAT YOU VOTED
FOR.

2005 Masters proposal.

1. Takeoff (U) K=1

2. Stall Turn 1 ¼ Rolls Up, ¾ Roll Down, Exit Inverted (U) K=4

3. Half Outside, 2/4 K=2

4. Reverse Avalanche with 1 positive snap @ Bottom (D) K=4

5. 1/2 loop with full Roll Out K=2

6. 45 degree Pyramid Loop with Half Rolls (U) K=4

7. Humpty Bump, ¼  Roll Up, ¾ Roll Down  K=3

8. Quarter, Half, Quarter Roll (D) K=4

9. Half Inside Loop, 2/4 on exit
K=1

10. Square Eight from the Middle, Pilot's Option (U)
K=4

11. Figure nine - pull loop first, 1/2 roll down
K=3

12. Slow Roll (D) K=3

13. Pull-Push Humpty Bump with Pilot's Option  K=2

14. Square Loop with 2/4 Rolls on all side (U) K=5

15. Stall Turn With Half Rolls K=2

16. Inside-Outside Diamond Eight with Full Rolls (D)
K=5

17. Immelmann Turn K=2


18. 45 Degree Down, Positive Snap Roll (U) K=3

19. Top Hat with ¾ Roll Up, ¼ Roll Down, Exit Upright K=3

20. Knife-edge to knife-edge (D) K=4

21. Half Square Loop with 1/2  Roll Up K=2

22.  Spin, 2 1/2 Turns, Half Roll Out, Exit Upright (U) K=4

23. Landing (U)  K=1


====================================# To be removed from this list,
send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
====================================# To be removed from this list, send a
message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
============# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#




=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#